Results 1 to 10 of 51
-
April 22nd, 2008, 09:15 AM #1Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Newtown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Age
- 64
- Posts
- 3,013
- Rep Power
- 1662876
DanP's op-ed in Philadelphia Inquirer today
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/18000224.html
Posted on Tue, Apr. 22, 2008
Shameless example of disregarding law
By Daniel Pehrson
It's time for Philadelphia leaders to understand that lawlessness by the city government is one of the many factors contributing to the city's culture of crime and violence. The lack of respect city officials have shown for the laws of Pennsylvania by passing illegal gun-control ordinances sets a tone for residents that honoring the rule of law is optional in this city.
When the City Council passed and Mayor Nutter signed a package of gun-control bills that limits the ability of law-abiding citizens to purchase and possess firearms, they brazenly declared themselves independent from the laws of the commonwealth. It didn't take long for the first suburb, Lower Chichester, to follow by unlawfully passing its own arbitrary gun-control laws.
Yet, what baffles me the most is that these leaders wonder where criminals get the idea that laws don't apply to them! Don't they see the example they set so publicly? The willful defiance has made headlines for weeks, reminding residents that the Council, mayor and police commissioner consider themselves to be above state law. Why shouldn't average citizens be as well?
District Attorney Lynne Abraham understands the rule of law, as do many police officers, who have voiced opposition to enforcing these measures they know to be illegal. They have reason to be concerned. If they knowingly enforce laws that have been previously declared illegal, they may be found liable in lawsuits. Those are lawsuits that they don't want to battle and the city can't afford to fight.
However, not to be stopped by the city attorneys, who actually have to stand in front of judges and argue the validity of the laws, Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey is encouraging the Council and mayor to ignore the legal advice against enforcing the ordinances. He was recently quoted arguing in favor of the illegal measures that "as far as I am concerned, the laws are valid, and we will act as if this whole conversation with the D.A. just didn't take place."
When the chief law-enforcement officer so shamelessly encourages city leaders to pretend they didn't hear legal advice from other officials, advice that could save thousands in taxpayer funds for litigation, it's time to question if he really has the best interest of the city in mind.
Lawful gun owners are not the problem, and our city leaders know it. They are in a better position than most to see the justice system turning criminals out to the streets, rather than putting them in prison. To solve the crime problems in Philadelphia and in other communities, leaders must be willing to embrace the rule of law, not blatantly sacrifice it for political points.
Until our elected officials learn to abide by the law, we gun owners will have to set an example. In what is only the first of many steps, gun-owner groups have filed for a temporary restraining order to prevent enforcement of the Philadelphia gun-control ordinances. Those of us who live in the city will continue to lawfully keep and bear our arms, waiting on the city to follow our lead in respecting the laws and constitution of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Pehrson (dpehrson@pafoa.org) is president of the Pennsylvania Firearms Owners Association.
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:06 AM #2
Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial By DanP
Appearing in Today's Philadelphia Inquirer:
Shameless example of disregarding law
By Daniel Pehrson
It's time for Philadelphia leaders to understand that lawlessness by the city government is one of the many factors contributing to the city's culture of crime and violence. The lack of respect city officials have shown for the laws of Pennsylvania by passing illegal gun-control ordinances sets a tone for residents that honoring the rule of law is optional in this city.
When the City Council passed and Mayor Nutter signed a package of gun-control bills that limits the ability of law-abiding citizens to purchase and possess firearms, they brazenly declared themselves independent from the laws of the commonwealth. It didn't take long for the first suburb, Lower Chichester, to follow by unlawfully passing its own arbitrary gun-control laws.
Yet, what baffles me the most is that these leaders wonder where criminals get the idea that laws don't apply to them! Don't they see the example they set so publicly? The willful defiance has made headlines for weeks, reminding residents that the Council, mayor and police commissioner consider themselves to be above state law. Why shouldn't average citizens be as well?
District Attorney Lynne Abraham understands the rule of law, as do many police officers, who have voiced opposition to enforcing these measures they know to be illegal. They have reason to be concerned. If they knowingly enforce laws that have been previously declared illegal, they may be found liable in lawsuits. Those are lawsuits that they don't want to battle and the city can't afford to fight.
However, not to be stopped by the city attorneys, who actually have to stand in front of judges and argue the validity of the laws, Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey is encouraging the Council and mayor to ignore the legal advice against enforcing the ordinances. He was recently quoted arguing in favor of the illegal measures that "as far as I am concerned, the laws are valid, and we will act as if this whole conversation with the D.A. just didn't take place."
When the chief law-enforcement officer so shamelessly encourages city leaders to pretend they didn't hear legal advice from other officials, advice that could save thousands in taxpayer funds for litigation, it's time to question if he really has the best interest of the city in mind.
Lawful gun owners are not the problem, and our city leaders know it. They are in a better position than most to see the justice system turning criminals out to the streets, rather than putting them in prison. To solve the crime problems in Philadelphia and in other communities, leaders must be willing to embrace the rule of law, not blatantly sacrifice it for political points.
Until our elected officials learn to abide by the law, we gun owners will have to set an example. In what is only the first of many steps, gun-owner groups have filed for a temporary restraining order to prevent enforcement of the Philadelphia gun-control ordinances. Those of us who live in the city will continue to lawfully keep and bear our arms, waiting on the city to follow our lead in respecting the laws and constitution of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Daniel Pehrson (dpehrson@pafoa.org) is president of the Pennsylvania Firearms Owners Association.
It's good to have a pro-gun message out in such an anti-gun media market. Kudos to the Inquirer for letting our side of the story be heard.
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:10 AM #3Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37698
Re: Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial By DanP
great job dan!!
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:23 AM #4
Re: Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial By DanP
Very nice work!
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:24 AM #5
Re: DanP's op-ed in Philadelphia Inquirer today
BRAVO!
Aboso-friggin-lutely awesome piece, Dan.
It doesn't shove "guns" in anyone's face, it puts a spotlight on the blatant lawlessness of those elected officials.
The last paragraph is perfect.
(as is the rest of it)I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:26 AM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Age
- 50
- Posts
- 362
- Rep Power
- 186
Re: Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial By DanP
GJ Dan! Thanks for standing up for law abiding gun owners like me In Philadelphia.
NEED should never enter into a discussion about RIGHTS
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:28 AM #7
Re: DanP's op-ed in Philadelphia Inquirer today
Sorry about the duplicate posts up top, I merged the two threads.
Hey, it's worth reading twice!
I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:29 AM #8
Re: Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial By DanP
Well put Great Editorial Dan P
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:33 AM #9
Re: DanP's op-ed in Philadelphia Inquirer today
Dan need to post in here so I can give him Rep...well said
-
April 22nd, 2008, 10:37 AM #10
Re: DanP's op-ed in Philadelphia Inquirer today
Very nice article Dan.
Originally Posted by Capt. Jean-Luc Picard
Similar Threads
-
I'll be at South Philadelphia Archery & Gun today (03/25/06)
By danp in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: January 13th, 2015, 03:46 PM -
Gun-control advocates undeterred by another legislative loss - Philadelphia Inquirer
By BIA_Design in forum GeneralReplies: 5Last Post: April 4th, 2008, 10:45 AM -
Philly Inquirer Wants Your Opinion
By Sebastian in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: December 4th, 2007, 06:40 AM -
Cabela's article in Philadelphia Inquirer
By MartinBrody in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: October 2nd, 2007, 10:48 AM -
The Inquirer explaineth, and I dissect
By Furious Styles in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: October 1st, 2006, 07:50 PM
Bookmarks