Results 11 to 20 of 21
-
March 28th, 2008, 08:18 PM #11
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
-
March 28th, 2008, 08:33 PM #12
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
I couldnt agree more. I think my posts maybe weren't worded very well. When I was mentioned not as MOSs would necessarily need it I was specifically thinking of a very select few, I was not talking about what was once considered "non-combat" MOSs. I think it is a good idea. The mission of the military has vasted changed in recent years. More training would be good for all troops. I think both should be done. I haven't been in for a while so I'm sure ALOT of things have changed.
~De-Animating the undead since '08~
-
March 28th, 2008, 11:35 PM #13
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
Sounds good to me. But I don't think that all service men and women need the new combat shoot practice. I like it.
BB3%
-
March 28th, 2008, 11:47 PM #14
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
Ahhh yes, nothing like ruining a nice chrome lined barrel by shoving a steel rod down the barrel
I think Combat MOSs should qualify on this as well as the standard pop ups. I think all MOSs should at least go through it, multiple times. A chef should know what to expect, but expecting him to qualify on it is a little stretch.
-
March 29th, 2008, 07:38 PM #15
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
Look guys, I don't mean to jump on anyone but. BRM QUALIFICATION, must be the same throughout the Army. If a particular unit wants to provide additional training requirements for it's soldiers, as long as they have the appropriate allocations of ammo and supplies, drive on! But every soldier that carries a rifle as his/her basic weapon must fire the same QUALIFICATION course. Secondly there is no such thing as a NON-COMBAT MOS. If a Division is short riflemen and you come through their repple-depot as a messkit repairman you can and probably will be re-assigned as a rifleman. Cooks, mechanics, radiomen, clerks, and even medics are armed and expected to defend themselves. The only exceptions that I was ever aware of was, Chaplains, Doctors and frontline medics. And there were even exceptions to those also.
BTW: In my former company the Mess Section had two 21/2 ton trucks with ring mounted Ma Dueces. The Mess Section was my Anti-Aircraft detail, my QRF was a combination of my Maintenance Section and my off-shift commo-men.
-
March 29th, 2008, 10:11 PM #16
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
I understand about the non combat MOSs that is why i had it in quotes. When I was in that is what most refered to MOSs not of the 11,12, or 13 series. I just wanted to clarify.
~De-Animating the undead since '08~
-
March 29th, 2008, 10:17 PM #17
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
I assume by "2nd echelon" you mean combat troops and by "crap" you mean successful mission.
If? Want? What exactly do you think combat units do during the years they are not in combat? Clean weapons, buff floors, and litter patrol? Not exactly.
Not to pick on you either, and sorry to single you out twice - it's not for YOUR benefit, I just think these are confusing messages to people that don't know.
-
March 30th, 2008, 10:48 PM #18
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
Basically this new qual course is in addition to the standard pop ups. And yes, everyone should have to qualify on both. As I said before, your MOS means nothing in todays missions, as is realized on a daily basis in the Iraq and Afghan AOs. You can be a mail clerk walking from the barracks to the dining facility and find yourself in a fire fight today. I think it is a great disservice to every troop to not have them as ready as they can be...
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty
than to those attending too small a degree of it."~Thomas Jefferson, 1791
Hobson fundraiser Remember SFN Read before you Open Carry
-
March 30th, 2008, 11:12 PM #19Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
-
Somewhere else,
Pennsylvania
(Cambria County) - Posts
- 2,757
- Rep Power
- 21474855
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
I like the shoot/no-shoot targets. That is something all soldiers should have been required to train with years ago.
-
March 30th, 2008, 11:15 PM #20Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
-
Franklin,
Pennsylvania
(Venango County) - Posts
- 3,920
- Rep Power
- 15878969
Re: Army evaluating new BRM qualifications - "Combat Shoot" Marksmanship
Heck, Korea and Vietnam taught us as much. (Except we did not learn)
Where's the front?
Draw a circle around yourself, private!
Similar Threads
-
Heidelberg "tactical" rifle/pistol shoot
By wizzegun in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: April 2nd, 2008, 10:25 AM -
Other than your need to "shOOt", do you have HOBBIES or other interests?
By dnar in forum GeneralReplies: 111Last Post: March 4th, 2008, 10:54 PM -
"We want you to make the next "Westy Group Shoot logo/slogan/picture"
By Mtbkski in forum GeneralReplies: 62Last Post: January 10th, 2008, 11:50 PM -
RJB Folding Gun ~"Swiss Army Gun!"
By RocketFoot in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: December 29th, 2007, 03:02 PM -
"Shoot first" laws making it tougher for burlars in the U.S.
By D-FENS in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: October 28th, 2007, 08:04 PM
Bookmarks