Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    1,001
    Rep Power
    6820

    Default Modification to a MAK-90

    So , Ive been thining about doing a little bit of modifications to my MAK-90. All I want to do is cut the thumbhole out a little bigger to fit my hand and hollow out the stock for storage. With these little modifications would I need to do the other stuff to make it compliant? Just wondering.
    No longer posting

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Around, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Posts
    1,655
    Rep Power
    205

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    Boy, that's a really good question! And, I'll wager it's not covered in 922r.
    You're not replacing the stock...just modifying the one currently on the rifle.
    It'll be quite interesting to see what kind of responses you get.
    Well, pushed 60 too hard so now I am the big SIX-OH. Now I can be a real pain in the ass! And, who says growin' old isn't fun!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    1,001
    Rep Power
    6820

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    no its original out of the box. I dont even think its been fired.
    No longer posting

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    3,262
    Rep Power
    11858

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    As long as you don't "sever" the wood strip that makes it a thumbhole, your fine. If you cut the original stock so that it's a stock and PG, then you have to worry about 922(r).

    Sounds like you just want to make the hole bigger, so I wouldn't worry about it.
    Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
    If the police could confiscate all of your guns and ammo using just one van, then you didn't own enough guns or ammo.
    WTB - NDS3 or NDS1 receiver FTF

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    1,001
    Rep Power
    6820

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    No i dont want to make it a pistol grip. I kinda like the ugly thumbhole, lol. The problem is my big hands, the thumbhole is slightly to small to be comfortable.
    I was thinking about making the hole bigger, hollow out the stock to store maybe a cleaning kit or extra ammo and then sanding it all down and refinishing it a dark color . Black or a dark brown. I like the draganuv stock but that requires 922 compliance and I dont want it that bad.
    No longer posting

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
    (Cumberland County)
    Posts
    78
    Rep Power
    92

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    Quote Originally Posted by mojo View Post
    As long as you don't "sever" the wood strip that makes it a thumbhole, your fine. If you cut the original stock so that it's a stock and PG, then you have to worry about 922(r).

    Sounds like you just want to make the hole bigger, so I wouldn't worry about it.
    You are making me nervous. I'm an immigrant from VA. What is the exact law above?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Fleetwood, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    870
    Rep Power
    34791

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    Quote Originally Posted by riverpirate View Post
    (SNIP)I like the draganuv stock but that requires 922 compliance and I dont want it that bad.
    Huh?

    Since that was not one of the "evil" pistol grip modifications and it's a one-piece unit I'd always thought that 922r compliance wasn't an issue for the Dragunov-equipped MAK-90. In fact my own MAK-90 had the Dragunov stock (ATI or Choate, not sure which) as standard equipment from the importer.

    Maybe it's a good thing I decided to have it converted, then...
    These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for. LMAO

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    1,001
    Rep Power
    6820

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    Quote Originally Posted by kunsunoke View Post
    Huh?

    Since that was not one of the "evil" pistol grip modifications and it's a one-piece unit I'd always thought that 922r compliance wasn't an issue for the Dragunov-equipped MAK-90. In fact my own MAK-90 had the Dragunov stock (ATI or Choate, not sure which) as standard equipment from the importer.

    Maybe it's a good thing I decided to have it converted, then...
    i read it needed 922 compliance on another forum , now i cant find it . I bet Jay would know when he reads this.
    No longer posting

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Private, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    4,952
    Rep Power
    1065881

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    922(r) only comes into play when you want to return the MAK-90 rifle to a form thats banned from importation.... namely a pistolgrip configuration.

    replacing one thumbhole buttstock with another does not trigger the 922(r) imported parts rule.

    its perfectly fine to put an ATI or whatever thumb hole dragunov style stock on, no other parts needed... modify to another form and 922r shows its head.
    (or in the case of post 1997 imported rifles, when Clinton disapproved the further importation of thumbhole stocked semiautos)

    on 922(r)...

    Section 922(r) makes it illegal to manufacture a weapon from all imported parts, in a form thats currently banned from importation.

    semiautomatic versions of automatic military firearms cannot be imported with any of the following features:
    pistolgrip
    bayonet lug
    flash hider or threaded barrel
    folding or collapsing stock
    grenade launcher
    night sights

    if you wish tom manufacture(aka modify) something like a thumbhole stocked MAK90 to pistolgripconfiguration, you must reduce the foreign parts count to 10 foreign parts or less... and these are SPECIFIC parts...
    the most common "compliance" parts are:
    pistolgrip
    butt stock
    handguards (upper and lower together count as 1 part)
    hammer
    trigger
    disconnector
    gas piston
    magazine followers
    magazine baseplates
    magazine bodies

    on most AKs... 5 parts replacement is common, to use ALL FOREIGN PART MAGAZINES.... 6 parts if you wish to have a muzzle device.not just screws and bolts...

    my AKs generally have:
    pistolgrip
    hammer/trigger/disconnector
    gas piston
    buttstock
    "Oderint Dum Metuant" - BMFH

    "Tact is for people not witty enough to use sarcasm"

    Note: any whingeing crazy that hits my PM inbox will be deleted without reply

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    lancaster, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    1,001
    Rep Power
    6820

    Default Re: Modification to a MAK-90

    Thanks Jay
    No longer posting

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Free at home Glock modification
    By bripro in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 13th, 2009, 01:30 AM
  2. New Springfield GI (need modification advice)
    By jerseytactical in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 18th, 2009, 07:15 PM
  3. Shotgun Modification; Body armor
    By knight0334 in forum General
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: November 25th, 2008, 09:21 PM
  4. Tell me about this barrel modification…..
    By Gary in Pennsylvania in forum General
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: August 30th, 2008, 05:59 PM
  5. USPSA: Modification Legalities
    By Wynder in forum General
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 29th, 2007, 10:11 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •