Which one should be banned?

[GRoPA]

Here are some stats I just looked up online. I am doing some research for a new business card I am designing. Whick one do you think should be banned....if either?


From the Planned Parenthood website at the following link:

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/bir...g-abortion.htm

"Choosing Abortion

The chances are high that a woman will have more than one unplanned pregnancy in the course of her lifetime. More than one-third of all U.S. women will have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old. About six million women in the U.S. become pregnant every year. Half of those pregnancies are unintended. Nearly 1.3 million women choose abortion to end their pregnancy each year. "

And now a little something from a "Handgun control" website: http://www.handguncontrol.org/. It is part of a Brady Anti-gun poster found on their homepage:

"IN 2004, GUNS MURDERED
5 PEOPLE IN NEW ZEALAND
37 IN SWEDEN
56 IN AUSTRALIA
73 IN ENGLAND AND WALES
184 IN CANADA
AND 11, 344 IN THE UNITED STATES
GOD BLESS AMERICA."


Therefore these stats show that nearly 1,300,000 babies are killed by abortion each year and 11,344 people (not just babies) were killed by firearms in 2004. Which one is worse? Which should be banned....if either....or both?

[Lycanthrope]

No "Ban Lycanthrope" option?


I voted neither........


Lycanfreedomtochoosethrope

[ithinkimamedic]

Neither and I will stand my ground on both issue.

#1 2nd ammendment need I say more?

#2 It is not my place to make this decision for a woman.

For some reason I dont see this thread working out to well.... but who know!?!

[RandomTask]

How about banning politicians?

[axmdr40]

Neither...I may really really hate abortion, but who am I to judge.

Of course we could just teach astinence only sex education and not have to worry about the whole abortion thing...I'm sure that will TOTALLY work out.... I'm sorry...lets just not go there.

[GRoPA]

This is more just to show the sillyness of the anti-gunners. I don't really think anything should be "Banned" per say.

If the anti-gunners are worried about saving lives, maybe they should go after the pro-abortion folks instead of lawful firearm owners.

[K31]

I voted neither.

[LittleRedToyota]

"
AND 11, 344 IN THE UNITED STATES
"

that's all??

don't get me wrong, if you or someone you love happens to be one of those 11,344, that would obviously suck...but, frankly, when compared to the entire population of the country, 11,000 people is statistically insignificant. that is certainly not a number that is worth giving up the right to defend yourself against criminals and tyranny over.

not to mention, of course, that guns didn't kill anyone in any of those countries...people did.

and, funny how handgun control, inc. doesn't mention the overall violent crime rates in any of those countries...prolly since england and australia have way higher violent crime rates than the US and that little inconvient truth might undermine their argument a bit.

anyway, i'm still in favor of banning bans.

[JayBell]

remember, keep abortion legal.
reduces the amount of moonbat liberals!

[soberbyker]

How about banning politicians?

I heard that I did, here's the guy we should start with:

http://www.pafoa.org/forum/lounge-10...html#post65015


.