Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    (Erie County)
    Posts
    764
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    As I understand, it is generally illegal to transport a firearm into NY or NJ with the exception of lawful transport through them if going to another state where possession is legal.

    My question is at what point does a firearm no longer qualify as a firearm? Suppose your traveling near the NY or NJ line and must enter the other State, and taking your firearm home first isn't an option. What if you rendered it inert? Perhaps by removing the firing pin from a 1911 and leaving it behind? Is it legally a firearm anymore? If so how many necessary parts would have to be missing?

    It would seem to me that leaving a firing pin (a damn important part) in PA and taking the more valuable parts with you would negate actually breaking the law? You could even leave the firing pin in an inconspicuous place in PA and retrieve it later when you returned.

    Thoughts?
    "When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles." - Unknown.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,213
    Rep Power
    21474856

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    If it's got a serial number on it (i.e. frame of a pistol or receiver of a rifle/lower reciever on an AR), it's a firearm. Doesn't matter if it's disassembled or not.
    Any mission, any conditions, any foe at any range.
    Twice the mayhem, triple the force.
    Ten times the action, total hardcore.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Freedonia, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    360
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    I'm not sure how New York views it but ATF considers the receiver the gun. So if you have the part with the serial number, you have the gun.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    (Erie County)
    Posts
    764
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Well it isn't the ATF though that would be pressing charges but I see the point.

    Thankfully there is nothing that could ever put in the position of having to enter either of those States.
    "When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles." - Unknown.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    .
    Posts
    8,196
    Rep Power
    10673760

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Quote Originally Posted by CoyoteJack View Post
    Well it isn't the ATF though that would be pressing charges but I see the point.

    Thankfully there is nothing that could ever put in the position of having to enter either of those States.
    No, the local gestapo would be pressing state charges.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    (Erie County)
    Posts
    764
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Quote Originally Posted by fingers80002 View Post
    No, the local gestapo would be pressing state charges.
    So is there something different in the design of the grip frame of a blank gun or non firing but other wise functional 1911 and the grip frame of a real one?

    The grip frame is the ATF controlled part of this and other semiauto pistols yes?
    "When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles." - Unknown.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh (Knoxville), Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,785
    Rep Power
    1890

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Quote Originally Posted by CoyoteJack View Post
    The grip frame is the ATF controlled part of this and other semiauto pistols yes?
    Not always.

    On my Keltec P-11, the receiver fits into the frame. They are separate parts.

    On a Glock, the Frame *is* the receiver. I believe the same applies to 1911's as well, but I'm not 100% sure (I've never taken one apart, so I couldn't tell you.)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Erie, Pennsylvania
    (Erie County)
    Posts
    764
    Rep Power
    29

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Quote Originally Posted by lildobe View Post
    Not always.

    On my Keltec P-11, the receiver fits into the frame. They are separate parts.

    On a Glock, the Frame *is* the receiver. I believe the same applies to 1911's as well, but I'm not 100% sure (I've never taken one apart, so I couldn't tell you.)
    For 1911's you can buy any part other than the grip frame without an FFL.

    New York is losing well over $1k a year in taxable revenue from me alone due to their inane firearm laws. I'd rather drive 3 times as far to ski each week by Pittsburgh than go to the much closer NY resort near me.
    "When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles." - Unknown.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Freedonia, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    360
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    Quote Originally Posted by CoyoteJack View Post
    The grip frame is the ATF controlled part of this and other semiauto pistols yes?
    Most but not all. A notable exception is the Ruger Mark I and it's descendents.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Scranton, Pennsylvania
    (Lackawanna County)
    Posts
    2,870
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport

    To completely ruin your day; a blank gun is considered a firearm except in very limited circumstances in NJ, as as a CO2 gun.
    "...a REPUBLIC, if you can keep it."

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 63
    Last Post: April 13th, 2009, 02:53 PM
  2. Hypothetical gun ban question
    By hower610 in forum General
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: December 10th, 2008, 03:26 PM
  3. Interstate gunsmith question
    By shooter357 in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: August 27th, 2008, 06:25 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: May 20th, 2008, 04:52 PM
  5. Hypothetical Question
    By Tony Fly in forum General
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2008, 05:50 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •