Gun Control And The AFL-CIO

**LastManOut** · March 2nd, 2009, 08:23 AM

Voice your views at your next union meeting (if you dare).

Gun Control And The AFL-CIO

The National Rifle Association of America is a single-issue organization that represents firearms owners and works to defend and protect their rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. In its 132-year history as the nation`s oldest civil rights organization, the NRA has never adopted any policy or practice regarding unions, organized labor, labor management or labor relations issues of any kind.

On the other hand, the American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) have continually stepped outside the purview of labor relations and adopted decidedly anti-gun positions that infringe upon the rights of law-abiding firearms owners.

The national leadership of the AFL-CIO has supported restrictive "gun control" legislation for nearly a quarter of a century.

1971: The Executive Council of the AFL-CIO adopted a resolution stating, "the AFL-CIO strongly urges Congress to enact strong handgun control legislation."

1976: The AFL-CIO announced it`s support for legislation which would ban "weapons such as the so-called `Saturday Night Special` from the public domain."

1987: The AFL-CIO`s Executive Council issued a resolution in support of a national seven-day waiting period on the purchase of all handguns.

1989: The AFL-CIO came out strongly in support of the Brady Bill and its national waiting period on the purchase of handguns by law-abiding gun owners. AFL-CIO leadership also resolved to support U.S. Sen. Dennis DeConcini`s S.747, a bill to ban the importation, domestic manufacture and sale of certain semi-automatic firearms.

1994: Most recently, the AFL-CIO`s leadership supported the Clinton Crime Bill and its ban on certain semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns and large-capacity magazines.

**TaePo** · March 2nd, 2009, 08:34 AM

I guess my question is why would they even feel a need to have this on their agenda in the first place?

**LastManOut** · March 2nd, 2009, 08:49 AM

Liberals just can't help themselves. Security [sic] over liberty.

**RoyJackson** · March 2nd, 2009, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by TaePo

I guess my question is why would they even feel a need to have this on their agenda in the first place?

And that is an extremely good point!!!!!!!!

Mostly, it's politics make strange bedfellows.

**jahwarrior72** · March 2nd, 2009, 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by TaePo

I guess my question is why would they even feel a need to have this on their agenda in the first place?

because the AFL-CIO is a bunch of socialist powermongers. duh?

**Whiskey Delta** · March 2nd, 2009, 11:00 AM

Our paramedic union is a branch (very distant branch) of the AFL-CIO.

We are largely a bunch of conservative gun-toters who hate the parent union.

We specifically voted to keep any of our contributions from going to PAC's.

There IS a way of denutting these unions from enacting any legislation other than that which relates to collective bargaining.

You just need to educate the union body. Quite a few union members are conservative in values, just ignorant of where the money goes.