Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    (Northampton County)
    Posts
    2,661
    Rep Power
    21474846

    Default 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    popc1.gif

    US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit Mexico filed against US gun makers
    Mexico argues negligence from makers such as Colt and Glock has led to gun trafficking to drug cartels and criminals

    The US supreme court said on Friday it will decide whether to block a $10bn lawsuit Mexico filed against US gun manufacturers and distributors that argues that their negligent and illegal commercial practices have unleashed bloodshed in the country.

    The lawsuit, filed in Boston in August, names Smith & Wesson, Barrett Firearms, Beretta, Colt and Glock, as well as Boston-area wholesaler Interstate Arms.

    The Mexican government says it wants to “put an end to the massive damage that the Defendants cause by actively facilitating the unlawful trafficking of their guns to drug cartels and other criminals in Mexico”.

    Mexico says 70% of the weapons trafficked to Mexico come from the US, according to the foreign affairs ministry. In 2019 alone, at least 17,000 homicides were linked to trafficked weapons, it has said.

    Alejandro Celorio, legal advisor for the Mexican government, has said the damage caused by the trafficked guns would be equal to 1.7% to 2% of Mexico’s GDP.

    But the firearms industry, through its US lobbying body, the National Shooting Sports Foundation, has said the allegations in the lawsuit are “baseless”.

    “The Mexican government is responsible for the rampant crime and corruption within their own borders,” said Lawrence Keane, the group’s senior vice-president and general counsel, said when the lawsuit was filed in 2021.

    That case has been through a number of lower court rulings. It was initially tossed out by a district court, then revived by the first US circuit court of appeals. The gunmakers appealed that ruling to the supreme court, arguing they have followed lawful practices and the case has no business in US courts.

    In August, US district judge Dennis Saylor dismissed the case against six of the eight companies, ruling that Mexico had not provided enough evidence that violence in the country was caused by US gun manufacturers’ negligence.

    Now the supreme court has agreed to hear the gunmakers’ petition. Lawyers for Mexico defended the appeal court ruling’s rationale and argued that it was premature for the supreme court to take up the case.

    Mexico claims US gunmakers know that the chain from manufacturer to distributor to dealer ends with sales to “straw buyers” who in turn sell them to the cartels, especially military-style weapons with serial numbers that are easy to erase.

    Attorneys for Smith & Wesson contend Mexico is trying to use the American court system to bankrupt the American firearms industry based on a “novel and far-fetched” legal claim. They argue that they are no more responsible for what dealers do than Budweiser is for a liquor store selling beer to a minor.

    Mexico is not the only country to claim that US guns are a de-stabilizing influence. A UN report in January estimated that half a million legal and illegal weapons had flooded into Haiti since 2020.

    The US state department has indicated it plans a new policing unit in Haiti to address weapons being trafficked into the country, which continues to be destabilized by gang violence.

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-supreme-court

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Barrett Twp., Pennsylvania
    (Monroe County)
    Posts
    256
    Rep Power
    21474850

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    So, in addition to the US providing them illegal weapons through fast & furious, now they’re trying to sue the mfgs? If this is allowed to go forward, it’s truly ridiculous.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Misanthrope, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Posts
    493
    Rep Power
    16603826

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    Any entity outside of the US legal juristriction filing a suit in the US should be dismissed for "not having standing" within the US. If not, then the US should be able to sue the Mexican Government for the cost and lives lost by the illegal drugs they are smuggling across our borders.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    next to my neighbor, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    14,055
    Rep Power
    21474868

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    Quote Originally Posted by TDIfan View Post
    So, in addition to the US providing them illegal weapons through fast & furious, now they*re trying to sue the mfgs? If this is allowed to go forward, it*s truly ridiculous.
    Joe will make sure it goes through, gotta keep that money laundering train rolling.
    FJB

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Glenmoore, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Age
    65
    Posts
    3,732
    Rep Power
    21474855

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    Quote Originally Posted by tlnzz1 View Post
    Any entity outside of the US legal juristriction filing a suit in the US should be dismissed for "not having standing" within the US. If not, then the US should be able to sue the Mexican Government for the cost and lives lost by the illegal drugs they are smuggling across our borders.
    Bill them for every wetback whose back gets wet from crossing the Rio Grande.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Enon Valley, Pennsylvania
    (Lawrence County)
    Posts
    437
    Rep Power
    6159086

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    Go after Obama and Holder for accessory to murder. No statute of limitations.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Where the amish roam, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    2,857
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: 🤔US supreme court will rule on $10bn suit

    So they should fast and furiously be suing the federal govt. then not the manufactures .

Similar Threads

  1. Supreme Court to allow suit against Remington
    By ExFlyinguy in forum National
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: November 14th, 2019, 04:08 PM
  2. Replies: 34
    Last Post: February 28th, 2013, 10:42 PM
  3. Replies: 38
    Last Post: June 3rd, 2009, 03:29 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 06:44 PM
  5. Supreme Court Will Rule on Vehicle Searches
    By larrymeyer in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: February 25th, 2008, 05:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •