Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    DuPont, Pennsylvania
    (Luzerne County)
    Posts
    622
    Rep Power
    1221

    Default Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Enola, Pennsylvania
    (Dauphin County)
    Posts
    511
    Rep Power
    89488

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Out-dated, yeah, but still good enough to be effective in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lancaster-ish, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    433
    Rep Power
    1693

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    IIRC most police style bullet proof vests are only effective against handgun rds...not rifle rounds. But I would have to side with cowering Enfield carrying cop. I'm not sticking my head out with a bolt action rifle against an automatic AK fire! From some of the pictures I've seen, at least some of their forces were carrying sweet looking FALs. Although I would bet they are military issued.

    We could train these guys but then what happens? They turn on us! The Mumbai attackers were trained by former Pakistani military officers. Where do you think they got their training?

    After reading this, I have changed my opinion of the cowering cops. http://forum.pafoa.org/general-2/407...fire-back.html
    Last edited by wizzegun; December 5th, 2008 at 11:55 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where liberty is but a flickering flame in the distance., New Jersey
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,904
    Rep Power
    9019

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Quote Originally Posted by wizzegun View Post
    IIRC most police style bullet proof vests are only effective against handgun rds...not rifle rounds. But I would have to side with cowering Enfield carrying cop. I'm not sticking my head out with a bolt action rifle against an automatic AK fire! From some of the pictures I've seen, at least some of their forces were carrying sweet looking FALs. Although I would bet they are military issued.

    We could train these guys but then what happens? They turn on us! The Mumbai attackers were trained by former Pakistani military officers. Where do you think they got their training?
    Bold is added by me.

    I would also take cover. I would also know that my .303 would have better range and accuracy so would retreat to cover that would allow me to use the advantages of my rifle on the fucktard who was "highly trained" spray and pray firing. It's all about knowing the strengths that your firearm has and using them effectively.

    As to the bolded section, that is a discussion for another thread. I believe we have pounded that more than a cheap whore in a South American port town.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lancaster-ish, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    433
    Rep Power
    1693

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    After reading the article, and ASSUMING it's half-way correct, it appeared the reporter was running around yelling at the police to fire back. I agree that tactics obviously were not an Indian strong point. You are at a train station with distances to take advantage of the .303 caliber. Although if their ammo is of the same quality as Pakistani .303, I wouldn't trust it either.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brookville, Pennsylvania
    (Jefferson County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    20,112
    Rep Power
    21474874

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    From what I understand, most of the police refused to use the weapons they had. A .303 Brit still packs a punch, and a half decent shot would put most people in their place.
    RIP: SFN, 1861, twoeggsup, Lambo, jamesjo, JayBell, 32 Magnum, Pro2A, mrwildroot, dregan, Frenchy, Fragger, ungawa, Mtn Jack, Grapeshot, R.W.J., PennsyPlinker, Statkowski, Deanimator, roland, aubie515

    Don't end up in my signature!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where liberty is but a flickering flame in the distance., New Jersey
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,904
    Rep Power
    9019

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Quote Originally Posted by knight0334 View Post
    From what I understand, most of the police refused to use the weapons they had. A .303 Brit still packs a punch, and a half decent shot would put most people in their place.
    That was my understanding too. Not that they were outmatched, but that they did not know how to properly employ the weaponry they had. A .303 is not the type of weapon you pop around a corner and take a quick shot with. I think they did not know how to employ the force they had available and thus remained behind cover.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    South Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    1,536
    Rep Power
    725

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Quote Originally Posted by wizzegun View Post
    After reading the article, and ASSUMING it's half-way correct, it appeared the reporter was running around yelling at the police to fire back. I agree that tactics obviously were not an Indian strong point. You are at a train station with distances to take advantage of the .303 caliber. Although if their ammo is of the same quality as Pakistani .303, I wouldn't trust it either.
    The reporter also referred to the Enfield as a "self-loading rifle" so yeah, I dunno whether that's a safe assumption or not.
    "When law becomes despotic, morals are relaxed, and vice versa."-- Honore de Balzac, The Wild Ass's Skin...huh, huh..Balzac...Wild Ass...huh, huh

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where liberty is but a flickering flame in the distance., New Jersey
    Age
    45
    Posts
    3,904
    Rep Power
    9019

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Quote Originally Posted by Eugene V. Debs View Post
    The reporter also referred to the Enfield as a "self-loading rifle" so yeah, I dunno whether that's a safe assumption or not.
    Where can I pick up one of them?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Queen, Pennsylvania
    (Bedford County)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    255
    Rep Power
    232

    Default Re: Lee-Enfield's no good for terrorism

    Quote Originally Posted by adymond View Post
    That was my understanding too. Not that they were outmatched, but that they did not know how to properly employ the weaponry they had. A .303 is not the type of weapon you pop around a corner and take a quick shot with. I think they did not know how to employ the force they had available and thus remained behind cover.
    Exactly , I have one and had they been properly trained they could
    have sat back and waited for one of these assholes to pop up , end
    of story !
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]"

Similar Threads

  1. Islamic terrorism-- what's up with that?
    By Eugene V. Debs in forum General
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: September 19th, 2008, 03:16 PM
  2. A new kind of terrorism?
    By P89 in forum General
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: May 15th, 2008, 04:51 PM
  3. Women & Beer to fight terrorism ..
    By SilentRage in forum General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 6th, 2008, 04:24 PM
  4. domestic terrorism or Radical environmentalism
    By WhiteFeather in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 1st, 2007, 11:19 AM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 12th, 2007, 03:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •