PA Assault Weapon and Magazine Ban of 2023

[KPShooting]

SB 200 https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs...&type=B&bn=200

An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in firearms and other dangerous articles, providing for assault weapons and large capacity magazines and establishing the Firearms and Ammunition Buyback Program and the Pennsylvania State Police Buyback Fund.

Submitted by the usual graboids including my illustrious senator. I'll have to draft up a letter reminding him how big of a piece of shit he is.

Here's a link to an FPC mailer about it. Hopefully we can kill this in committee.

[mikelets456]

".... however it does include a registration clause for any grandfathered firearms in addition to a list of places these arms can be stored."

WTF? I have lost patience with these A-holes! "....shall not be QUESTIONED"!!!!

[tlnzz1]

The question is: When you face a deadline to register your firearms, will you register them, or will you load them up and put them to good use ??????????????? History proves confiscation is always preceded by registration.

[DK23]

The question is: When you face a deadline to register your firearms, will you register them, or will you load them up and put them to good use ??????????????? History proves confiscation is always preceded by registration.

People on here have already registered their 'SBRs', so I think we have your answer.

[Spirit of 76]

Give'em an inch . . .

HB 714 (Universal Background Checks)

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs...dy=H&rc_nbr=96

HB 1018 (Extreme Risk Protection Order)

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs...dy=H&rc_nbr=93

. . . and they'll take a mile.

SB 200
Assault Weapons Ban

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs...type=B&bn=0200

[85MikeTPI]

People on here have already registered their 'SBRs', so I think we have your answer.

*But it*s free and I*m not in a good place to fight the gubermint right now*.

[Walleye Hunter]

Just do a search on NY Safe act and compliance to get the answers you seek.

[GunLawyer001]

People on here have already registered their 'SBRs', so I think we have your answer.

Your post shows a lack of understanding.

SBR's have been regulated for almost 90 years.

Brace stocks were marketed & used just like shoulder stocks. They look like buttstocks, they function like buttstocks. I'd wager that 99% of range use is as a buttstock.

The error was in approving them as "not buttstocks".

I've mentioned multiple times that the 1934 law was a mistake, SBR's were only included because the 1930's gun grabbers tried to add all handguns to the NFA, and SBR's were an obvious reaction by the citizens who wanted concealable guns once pistols were banned. They failed on handguns, but left in the SBR's for no articulable reason. But that's been the law for 89 years. Maybe the Court will strike it down, or maybe that's old-enough nonsense to be tolerated.

There's a difference between resisting massive registration/forfeiture of semi-auto guns that were legal for the last 140 years, and risking everything over not wanting ATF to have another Form 1 in your name over a poorly-designed SBR. Few of us here would shoot someone for stealing our lawn furniture, but many would shoot an arsonist about to burn our home down. It's not weakness, it's judgment.

[DK23]

Your post shows a lack of understanding.

SBR's have been regulated for almost 90 years.

Brace stocks were marketed & used just like shoulder stocks. They look like buttstocks, they function like buttstocks. I'd wager that 99% of range use is as a buttstock.

The error was in approving them as "not buttstocks".

I've mentioned multiple times that the 1934 law was a mistake, SBR's were only included because the 1930's gun grabbers tried to add all handguns to the NFA, and SBR's were an obvious reaction by the citizens who wanted concealable guns once pistols were banned. They failed on handguns, but left in the SBR's for no articulable reason. But that's been the law for 89 years. Maybe the Court will strike it down, or maybe that's old-enough nonsense to be tolerated.

There's a difference between resisting massive registration/forfeiture of semi-auto guns that were legal for the last 140 years, and risking everything over not wanting ATF to have another Form 1 in your name over a poorly-designed SBR. Few of us here would shoot someone for stealing our lawn furniture, but many would shoot an arsonist about to burn our home down. It's not weakness, it's judgment.

Maybe we will get the chance to see what people will do if the Dems win the House back. I'm betting not too much and will bend over and take it with minimal lube.

[steve_010]

Unconstitutional laws are not laws.