Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
-
February 3rd, 2023, 10:17 PM
#10
Re: Police interaction
Originally Posted by
Bang
If they have to BREAK INTO a car to steal the contents, the contents were secure. If the car contents is considered not secure because the car can be broken into, then might as well view a sucker-punched gun carrier losing his wallet and gun just as unsecured.
Calling the gun loser a tard sure sounds like blame to me. How about a home break-in resulting in gun(s) on the street. Is that a tard'ed victim too? Next...a peeled safe labeled not secure enough?
You have a loose definition of "secure".
If you leave your gun on your dashboard in plain sight and lock the car, that isn't "secure". That's merely placed in a locked car.
Locking it in a glove box is also just locked in a glove box in a locked car. Still not "secure".
Similar Threads
-
By RightRock in forum Open Carry
Replies: 8
Last Post: June 6th, 2014, 10:48 AM
-
By Lexington in forum Open Carry
Replies: 36
Last Post: February 10th, 2013, 08:59 AM
-
By JoeyBones in forum Concealed Carry
Replies: 8
Last Post: April 21st, 2011, 01:32 AM
-
By ksig1869 in forum General
Replies: 19
Last Post: December 21st, 2008, 10:09 PM
-
By jahwarrior72 in forum General
Replies: 37
Last Post: November 3rd, 2008, 10:20 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks