Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
If they have to BREAK INTO a car to steal the contents, the contents were secure. If the car contents is considered not secure because the car can be broken into, then might as well view a sucker-punched gun carrier losing his wallet and gun just as unsecured.

Calling the gun loser a tard sure sounds like blame to me. How about a home break-in resulting in gun(s) on the street. Is that a tard'ed victim too? Next...a peeled safe labeled not secure enough?
You have a loose definition of "secure".

If you leave your gun on your dashboard in plain sight and lock the car, that isn't "secure". That's merely placed in a locked car.

Locking it in a glove box is also just locked in a glove box in a locked car. Still not "secure".