Results 451 to 460 of 1459
-
January 21st, 2023, 10:33 AM #451Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
-
SE PA,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 60
- Rep Power
- 287572
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
-
January 21st, 2023, 11:46 AM #452Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 480
- Rep Power
- 21474840
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Can you sell a SBR face to face in PA without going through channels? I don't believe so but could be wrong. It's my understanding that as of the date of rule publication in the Fed register (not sure what that date is) these braced pistols are "officially" all SBR. I would think saying you sold it after applying for registration might be problematic.
This whole thing really is the dictionary definition of SHIT SHOW.Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
-
January 21st, 2023, 12:05 PM #453
-
January 21st, 2023, 12:54 PM #454
-
January 21st, 2023, 01:02 PM #455
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
I would disagree on most if not all of your points.
Require special training for machineguns? You dont need that now to buy them. You just need the coin. Most pedestrians can figure out a machine gun within a couple magazines.
M2s being used in crimes? Unlikely. An M2 parts kit is about $8k-$10k, semi guns are touching $15k, so the lack of parts kits and built guns will still keep them unobtainable for the majority. Not to mention, you have to have a brain to set up and M2 and safely fire it. The M2 can easily kill in both directions if you let it.
Same for artillery, which you can currently own or Form 1 manufacture. There is barely anything on the market to buy. The FEL required to buy powder and load rounds is another hurdle. Trust me, I know.
If you made it legal to manufacture transferable machineguns the cost of parts would go absolutely insane. Most people would register receivers but spend a long time looking out the window waiting for cheap conversion parts to show up.
-
January 21st, 2023, 02:27 PM #456PickingPA Guest
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
ATF sets up a booth a SHOT show? Just to rub people’s noses in it, or what?
I thought their routine was to cruise the parking lot, snapping photos of license plates.
-
January 21st, 2023, 04:39 PM #457Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
-
Pen Argyl,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 350
- Rep Power
- 9037732
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Any transfer between individuals has to go through an FFL licensed to process NFA transfers. And yes, once the final rule is published in the Federal Register they are SBRs and subject to all the SBR laws/rules.
There is no automatic denial that occurs 88 days after the application is filed. That's incorrect information that people keep parroting. As I posted above:
Originally Posted by The FBI
-
January 21st, 2023, 04:52 PM #458
-
January 21st, 2023, 05:09 PM #459Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Berks County,
Pennsylvania
(Berks County) - Posts
- 3,334
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Bet $250k and 10 years in Club Fed on that?
I bought a used suppressor with no dealer involved. The seller and I wrote up a simple contract, completed the Form 4, and I filed it myself.
I guess the GOA lawyer that asked the ATF agent at SHOT must have been lying about the 88 days? He said he asked the agent about the 88 days and she confirmed that. He then asked what would happen after that time and the agent told him they would pursue enforcement. Surely the ATF sent representation to SHOT that would be able to answer these questions because it's the hottest topic in the gun world right now. Did she just make it up?
His video has been posted in this thread and it's all over the web.
-
January 21st, 2023, 05:19 PM #460Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
-
Pen Argyl,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 350
- Rep Power
- 9037732
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
I don't believe anyone was lying, but rather the information was simply misunderstood. That incorrect information then spread from the initial source and is now plastered all over. It is no more true after 10,000 post it than it is after 1 person posted it though. If there was any truth to the original information, absolutely no one would have a suppressor since I don't think one of those applications has ever been processed in 88 days. I have posted the correct info in the post you partially quoted - along with a quote directly from the FBI's website - and it's there if you want it.
Similar Threads
-
ATF ruling......
By verbious in forum GunsmithingReplies: 25Last Post: January 4th, 2015, 10:52 PM
Bookmarks