Results 341 to 350 of 1008
-
January 19th, 2023, 04:20 PM #341
Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
-
Reading,
Pennsylvania
(Berks County) - Posts
- 579
- Rep Power
- 12407593
-
January 19th, 2023, 04:25 PM #342
-
January 19th, 2023, 04:58 PM #343
-
January 19th, 2023, 05:40 PM #344
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
I thought for sure that you were going to suggest kidnapping Governor Whitmer, or going into the Capitol.
You're legally wrong, of course. In PA, any firearm falling under Section 908 is presumed to be illegal, but you can raise an affirmative defense that it's federally registered. Meaning that seeing it is enough for any PA LEO to detain and question you, at least.
It is a defense under this section for the defendant to prove by a preponderance of evidence that he possessed or dealt with the weapon solely as a curio or in a dramatic performance, or that, with the exception of a bomb, grenade or incendiary device, he complied with the National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. § 5801 et seq.),Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
January 19th, 2023, 06:52 PM #345
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
contrary to davidh,
i thought someone who is "printing" could be stopped and asked to produce the card. if it were even just written off as a welfare check or suspicious activity. thought as long as we still had an ltcf requirement for concealing we were ripe for harassment.
but his paragraph also omits the "threw the pistol on the back seat and got stopped for a [insert driving issue here]" which of course is a valid prompt for an ltcf.There is no way to make it out alive...
-
January 19th, 2023, 07:25 PM #346
Active Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
-
Pen Argyl,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 133
- Rep Power
- 2501878
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
The ATF FAQ and form has been corrected to reflect that you only need to prove the gun was assigned to the trust prior to publication of the final rule. The Federal Registry states that the typical time for publication is 3 business days after submission (1/13) and we know the ATF likes to break news on Friday to improve the odds that it slips by unnoticed for a few days, so tomorrow (1/20) seems likely for publication of the final rule. I would get the assignment sheet notarized this evening if that's the direction you're headed. Maybe they take it without notarization, maybe not. If it doesn't publish tomorrow, then you at least until the clock strikes 12am on Monday since the FR doesn't publish on weekends.
-
January 19th, 2023, 07:43 PM #347
Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Berks County,
Pennsylvania
(Berks County) - Posts
- 3,119
- Rep Power
- 21474850
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Not that the entire issue isn't a fiasco, but since ATF has never requested a notarized Schedule A from me for any filing, so if there is no direction in the new 'regulation' that a notarized Schedule A is required, how can they demand it?
-
January 19th, 2023, 07:55 PM #348
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Hmm maybe I will visit the notary tomorrow. Can't do it today.
Historically, if you want to sell an SBR, most folks would convert it back to the pistol or rifle it started life as and sell it in that configuration. I think the internet agrees that letting the ATF know you are removing it from the NFA is optional, but a rational idea. I have one firearm in a rifle configuration that was previously an SBR owned by a friend. His info engraved on it doesn't bother me, since it was done as small as legally possible and in a discreet place. You wouldn't notice it unless I pointed it out. He sent a letter to the ATF saying it was being removed from the NFA and nothing ever came back.
So for ARs and other SBRs with easily swapped components that is what I would recommend if you decide to sell an SBR. For other guns, like my M1927A1 Thompson SBR, I would probably sell that with a Form 4 transfer if I needed to sell it, as swapping the barrel is a pain, I sold the original 16" barrel a long time ago, and someone would probably have the interest in buying an SBR M1927A1.
I'm surprised no one brought up the restrictions on crossing state lines with an SBR without an approved ATF Form 5320.20. If you cross state lines frequently with your firearm I am told you can fill out the form for a year's period and just say "frequent recreational shooting trips" or something at that destination. I've only used the form for individual trips to Ohio for shooting events. They're no big deal unless you procrastinate/forget.In America arms are free merchandise such that anyone who has the capital may make their houses into armories and their gardens into parks of artillery. - Ira Allen, 1796
-
January 19th, 2023, 08:20 PM #349
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2022
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Posts
- 1
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Literally no clue if my "Firearm" ar-15 with a brace is gonna be illegal or not now. And no one seems to have a straight answer.
Anyway. ATF can go kick rocks.
-
January 19th, 2023, 08:25 PM #350
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
"If you're not catching flak, you're not over the target"
Similar Threads
-
[Want To Sell] SB TACTICAL HK Folding brace for MP5/SP5/K AND telescoping brace for MP5/SP5/K
By itzbuildingtime in forum Firearm Parts & AccessoriesReplies: 0Last Post: March 18th, 2022, 09:44 AM -
ATF ruling......
By verbious in forum GunsmithingReplies: 25Last Post: January 4th, 2015, 10:52 PM
Bookmarks