Results 1,241 to 1,250 of 1459
-
June 5th, 2023, 01:07 PM #1241
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
I'm just happy the number is only 250k out of the millions of braces that were sold over the last decade. That's a big FU to their registration in general.
-
June 5th, 2023, 01:13 PM #1242
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Given a 4% compliance rate with NY's Safe Act, I am not surprised.
https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2016/07/...with-safe-act/Gender confusion is a mental illness
-
June 5th, 2023, 09:46 PM #1243Banned
- Join Date
- May 2023
- Location
-
.,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 18
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
Rep Andrew Clyde updates his bill (to kill the pistol brace rule) on Bannon’s War Room today
https://rumble.com/v2sbfmg-rep.-andr...rule-of-t.html
-
June 5th, 2023, 10:53 PM #1244Grand Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
-
New Tripoli,
Pennsylvania
(Lehigh County) - Posts
- 2,375
- Rep Power
- 21474845
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
-
June 5th, 2023, 11:04 PM #1245
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
First of all, I don't know if his estimates used are correct, but he obviously doesn't know how math works.
255k÷10M= 0.025 x100 (to get a percentage) = 2.55% not 0.025%
Eta: Second of all, how does he know how many people didn't just remove the brace to be compliant? That takes about 5 seconds. He says half of his estimated 20M didn't comply, would like to see where he got that number.
-
June 6th, 2023, 02:44 AM #1246Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2022
- Location
-
Under a mountain
- Posts
- 576
- Rep Power
- 21474839
Re: ATF Just Released Their Brace Ruling
His math was off. He made the above video on the June 4th. People pointed that out to him in the comments of the video and he made another video on June 5th admitting he made a mistake and did some new extrapolating with the numbers.
As for the 2nd part, every estimate people including him are making is literally guessing and pulling things out of their ass. No one knows the true number of braces out there. I doubt that many/any except perhaps an occasional Sean Penn type destroyed or turned theirs in. But it would not surprise me if that number is 0.
The only number we do know is how many applied to SBR.
So for the rest it was either leave the brace on, or take the brace off. No way to know who did what. And without any source data to use as a guesstimate, I put no stock in his or any of the numerous *experts* making videos about the topic right now nor will I throw out BS numbers.
Still to many unclear questions even with the above to determine compliance with the rule.. Biggest in my mind is is it enough to take the brace off or do you have to alter/destroy it also. I could see a ton of people removing the brace but not destroying it. If you listen to the director who went before Congress, removing it means you complied. If you listen to the letters that the ATF put out, just removing it is not compliance.
Then you work injunctions and possible interpretations into the mix and things get even more confusing.
Somehow after 4 months things are clear as mud and impossible to get a true estimate of how many complied with the rule in some form or another. Way to go AFT
-
June 6th, 2023, 07:12 AM #1247Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 480
- Rep Power
- 21474840
-
June 6th, 2023, 09:02 AM #1248
-
June 6th, 2023, 09:23 AM #1249
-
June 6th, 2023, 09:37 AM #1250
Similar Threads
-
ATF ruling......
By verbious in forum GunsmithingReplies: 25Last Post: January 4th, 2015, 10:52 PM
Bookmarks