Results 31 to 40 of 45
-
November 22nd, 2022, 10:37 PM #31Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
Definitely possible. However, always at the wind*s mercy with 223. Here*s an *almost mirror of that load. 75gr OTM & Varget.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1Wv7sXLkqM
Edit: In the video he*s using 75gr OTM, not ELD-M.Last edited by DavidH; November 23rd, 2022 at 08:26 PM.
Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
November 23rd, 2022, 08:41 AM #32Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
It's more than velocity. You need a bullet with high BC. I shoot a Hornady 75 Gr. ELD-M which has a G7 BC of 0.235 W/ my 22" Barlein barrel I get a MV of 2850 FPS. At 1000 yards the bullet is travelling at 1259 FPS. At my atmospheric conditions this is Mach 1.13. In my experience you start entering a transonic zone 10% above Mach 1. My muzzle velocity is measured by my Labradar Chronograph. Furthermore, dope data every 100 yards from 300 to 1000 yards verify my ballistic model (BC & MV).
For comparison, when shooting a Hornady 75 gr. BTHP which has a G7 BC of 0.17 (this is my BC number as Hornady only publishes a G1 number), my velocity at 800 yards is 1238 FPS (M = 1.09). I could shoot at 800 but not hit anything at 900. Clearly instability as the bullet approaches Mach 1 was the culprit.
-
November 23rd, 2022, 08:48 AM #33Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
Spot on. 24.0 grains of Varget is my load and gets me 2850 fps in my 22" Bartlein. Marginally compressed and close to a max load, but I would go up to 24.5 grains if I had to. As in all load data, this is my data and may not work for you.
As I said in my previous post, it will be supersonic, but only with a high BC bullet.Last edited by MMH; November 23rd, 2022 at 03:07 PM.
-
November 23rd, 2022, 08:53 AM #34Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
OK - maybe not reliable but can we agree on great fun & economical? You certainly learn how to read the wind and when you move to a 308 or 6.5 wonder-anything it feels like cheating. For comparison, w/ a 10mph wind at 1000 yds. a 5.56 drifts 100" as compared to 63" for a 6.5 Creedmore.
Last edited by MMH; November 23rd, 2022 at 02:23 PM.
-
November 23rd, 2022, 09:14 AM #35Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
-
West Chester,
Pennsylvania
(Chester County) - Posts
- 1,432
- Rep Power
- 10176462
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
What I have seen is the 75 eld-m is too long for AR mag length, what did you do make them fit?
-
November 23rd, 2022, 01:03 PM #36Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
My rifle has a Compass Lake Engineering (CLE) chamber. This chamber has a shorter throat but with a more aggressive lead than a Wylde Chamber. It is specifically designed to shoot long bullets loaded to magazine length. I load 75 gr. ELD-M bullet to a COAL of 2.23 (max mag. length is 2.26) w/ a base-to-ogive distance of 1.821".
Rifle is magazine fed & 100% reliable.
-
November 23rd, 2022, 03:47 PM #37Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
No idea how he is making hits at 1000 yards. He is shooing a 18" barrel and zooming in on his dope chart/ballistic table his MV is 2650 FPS which seems about right. He also said he is shooing a Hornady 75 gr. BTHP. This means that at 600 yards his velocity is 1295 FPS and he is entering the transonic area. At 1000 yards his velocity is down to 927 FPS and he is comfortably subsonic. Maybe the bullet stabilizes once it gets through the transonic zone (+/- 10% of Mach 1). Most bullet don't but some do.
As far as wind drift, w/ a 10 MPH wind at 1000 yards his load would drift 174". He was shooting in a heavy wind with big gusts. Not saying that making the hits he was making in those conditions w/ that load is impossible, but, I just would have to see it myself to believe it.
-
November 23rd, 2022, 08:13 PM #38Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
Yes, we do agree on your previous. As for the video* He did manage 5 hits. But that was a 24* X 36* target. His spread was like 30*, which is 2.86MOA. Could also see when the wind kicked up the bullets were being swung far right or left of target. And he did say at the end it was his THIRD attempt at 1000yds with 223, so it*s like you said learning to read wind. Fun* YES! Dingin* steel is so much more fun than punching paper.Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
November 23rd, 2022, 08:33 PM #39Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: AR’s built for accuracy, let’s see them.
Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
November 23rd, 2022, 10:40 PM #40Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
-
Murrysville,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 808
- Rep Power
- 845903
Similar Threads
-
Practical accuracy vs. Bulls eye accuracy....
By Neko456 in forum Training, Tactics & CompetitionReplies: 46Last Post: February 27th, 2012, 08:22 PM -
Which .22 for accuracy
By HamburgBoy84 in forum PistolsReplies: 24Last Post: April 1st, 2010, 08:35 PM -
Help with Rem 700 accuracy
By ticker in forum GeneralReplies: 48Last Post: August 1st, 2009, 10:05 PM
Bookmarks