Supreme Court won't hear bump stock ban case

**Emptymag** · October 3rd, 2022, 09:43 PM

Originally Posted by Delkal

This is a bump stock thread so thats a hint.

Bump socks are accessories - not firearms.

**JenniferG** · October 4th, 2022, 12:30 AM

I thought the Supreme Court already ruled that these alphabet agencies can't make their own laws with the EPA ruling????? I guess the ATF doesn't have to obey that decision because of guns.

**USMC3531** · October 4th, 2022, 01:03 AM

Originally Posted by Emptymag

Bump socks are accessories - not firearms.

But if they are accessories they can't be machineguns.....

**ExFlyinguy** · October 4th, 2022, 01:45 PM

Originally Posted by JenniferG

I thought the Supreme Court already ruled that these alphabet agencies can't make their own laws with the EPA ruling????? I guess the ATF doesn't have to obey that decision because of guns.

The SCOTUS is more or less guidelines than actual rules

**ExFlyinguy** · October 7th, 2022, 02:45 PM

Hoping this isn't dead in the water.

There is another bump stock case scheduled for enbanc(sp?) in 5th circuit.

**bogey1** · October 7th, 2022, 04:19 PM

We need another mass shooting with a bumpstock, and pistol brace. That'll fix it.

**Bang** · October 7th, 2022, 10:26 PM

The Marshall is 100 correct in my NSHO. I have posted in the past that I am no longer sending money to fake gun rights orgs. When one addresses violations of the 2nd amendment, it will get my attention. There is certainly a wealth of wrongs in need of correction.

**The Hobbit** · October 8th, 2022, 12:07 PM

Isn*t there a couple of cases challenging NFA directly working their way up? If so and the intent is to take the case, it would probably be viewed as redundant and unneeded to hear a bumpstock specific case. Granted that assumes they want to hear and NFA challenge and that they are leaning towards striking it down.