Results 21 to 30 of 30
-
July 1st, 2022, 04:19 PM #21
-
July 1st, 2022, 04:25 PM #22
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
That's how the system works, those laws are in place until they get thrown out by a court, which the state will appeal until a court rules in their favor or they make it to the supremes, and then the leftist states will figure out some way to write a ban bill that's worded in a way that "complies" with the ruling. Its a process that will take years.
-
July 1st, 2022, 06:13 PM #23Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
What the SCOTUS did was basically say: *hey lower lose-, we mean LIBERAL courts* you may want to rethink your position o these ridiculous ANTI 2A laws, or we*ll make the decision for you!*
This open the door for many more law suits. Eventually, they will get sick of paying people $25K, $50M, $150K. Cities HATE that! Anyone that does understand the importance of this is being obtuse. (Or FUDDS or *Closet Liberals* I know there are a few here unfortunately. That*s ok* you*ll be put down in the next Civil War to!)Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
July 1st, 2022, 06:15 PM #24
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
Rules are written in the stone,
Break the rules and you get no bones,
all you get is ridicule, laughter,
and a trip to the house of pain.
-
July 1st, 2022, 08:57 PM #25Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Berks County,
Pennsylvania
(Berks County) - Posts
- 3,334
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
-
July 1st, 2022, 09:53 PM #26
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
...Since in 1791, most firearms were limited to 1 or 2 shots, we feel that can carry over to modern firearms, thus limiting the People's arms to 1 or 2 shots.There are two kinds of guns. Those I have acquired, and those I hope to.
-
July 1st, 2022, 10:54 PM #27Grand Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
-
Tioga County,
Pennsylvania
(Tioga County) - Posts
- 4,959
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
Repeating rifles go back to the 1600s and were well known at the time of the Revolution and including breech loading guns, did see some limited use in the war.
https://www.rockislandauction.com/ri...cond-amendment
-
July 1st, 2022, 11:05 PM #28
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
Rules are written in the stone,
Break the rules and you get no bones,
all you get is ridicule, laughter,
and a trip to the house of pain.
-
July 2nd, 2022, 12:39 AM #29Super Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
somewhere,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 625
- Rep Power
- 21474849
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
1994 is not the relevant timeframe for "text, informed by history and tradition."
In NYSRPA v. Bruen, SCOTUS explained (in essence) that the relevant timeframe for "history and tradition" that illuminates the original meaning of the 2nd Amendment is during the time that the 2nd Amendment and/or 14th Amendment were adopted, (1791 and 1863, respectively) and shortly before and after. Anything outside of that timeframe, especially anything in the late 19th century or after), is not useful to understanding the original intent of the 2A and cannot therefore be used as a justification for deeming regulations constitutional.
If a modern regulation does not have an analogous regulation that was broadly implemented, accepted, and understood to be constitutional at the time that the 2nd Amendment (and/or 14th Amendment, in the case of state laws) were adopted, it is unconstitutional. It is the Government's burden to prove that there are analogous regulations in the relevant timeframe, and none exist.
No such regulations existed banning or limiting magazines or other firearm technologies at the time of adoption, ergo they are unconstitutional.
Now, getting the lower courts to follow along and do this correctly -- that's a separate issue.I am not a lawyer.
-
July 2nd, 2022, 04:38 PM #30
Re: Supreme Court just ruled! No more Magazine restrictions!
They even have minds but do not think. -Dov Fischer
Similar Threads
-
PA Supreme Court - Overrules Commonwealth v. Robinson (from 1991 Superior Court)
By ImminentDanger in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 2Last Post: June 1st, 2019, 08:01 AM -
Appeals court strikes down Chicago's restrictions on gun ranges
By priell3 in forum NationalReplies: 2Last Post: January 20th, 2017, 08:29 AM -
Sunnyvale restrictions upheld by appeals court
By djpup in forum NationalReplies: 15Last Post: March 6th, 2015, 09:53 PM -
Court restrictions not related to offense
By Montell C. Williams in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: June 9th, 2007, 06:26 PM
Bookmarks