Pistol Brace Executive Order

[HKusp 45]

you don't like advance notice of guests?
how will you know to set the table?
or about any potential food allergies.

stuffed dog with tannerite at all inside entrances .

[icp4life162005]

you don't like advance notice of guests?
how will you know to set the table?
or about any potential food allergies.

You weren't raised to always be ready and accommodating to company, with a 15 second clean and bright?

Besides, I'm a "deplorable". If they only have one reason to knock, your not living life right haha

[icp4life162005]

stuffed dog with tannerite at all inside entrances .

Lmfao

[fallenleader]

You weren't raised to always be ready and accommodating to company, with a 15 second clean and bright?

Besides, I'm a "deplorable". If they only have one reason to knock, your not living life right haha

you're still only a deplorable? most of us are like super saiyajin 4 ultra maga domestic terrorist nazi deplorables now.

[ShadeRabbit]

Sticking this in here because I imagine it may affect whether the ATF oh-so-generously decides to offer "free" tax stamps for pistol braces...


Supreme Court rejects another bump stock ban case

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Monday again declined to hear a lawsuit involving a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns.

The justices' decision not to hear the case leaves in place a lower court decision that rejected bump stock owners' efforts to be compensated for bump stocks they lawfully purchased, but were required to to give up after the administration ruled they were illegal. Lower courts had said the case should be dismissed.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-c...150531730.html

[HKusp 45]

Sticking this in here because I imagine it may affect whether the ATF oh-so-generously decides to offer "free" tax stamps for pistol braces...


Supreme Court rejects another bump stock ban case

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Monday again declined to hear a lawsuit involving a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, the gun attachments that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire rapidly like machine guns.

The justices' decision not to hear the case leaves in place a lower court decision that rejected bump stock owners' efforts to be compensated for bump stocks they lawfully purchased, but were required to to give up after the administration ruled they were illegal. Lower courts had said the case should be dismissed.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-c...150531730.html

easy don't comply , we have already proven common use. Coincidentally how many people have been arrested for not turning in their bumpstocks?

[GOYABEAN]

[IMG=CONFIG]161802[/IMG]

[PickingPA]

Was there a bumpstock database?


Didn’t think so

[RockIsland]

Was there a bumpstock database?


Didn*t think so

Actually...

[Walleye Hunter]

I haven't been keeping up on this. What is the current status on pistol braces?