Pistol Brace Executive Order

[bogey1]

The real question to my mind, given the upcoming midterms, is IF the R side of the coin can manage to retake the house or senate or both, ***can something be done about this***? I'm not saying that they may want to do so - hell, that's giving them too much credit. But 'could' this bs be kicked to the curb by congress in some way?

I highly doubt they'll help.

[85MikeTPI]

The real question to my mind, given the upcoming midterms, is IF the R side of the coin can manage to retake the house or senate or both, ***can something be done about this***? I'm not saying that they may want to do so - hell, that's giving them too much credit. But 'could' this bs be kicked to the curb by congress in some way?

You can probably count on one hand, the number of rules that have been "rolled-back" after instituting them... There's too much swamp to drain and these "little" items
never trickle up to the top of anyones' list...

[Noah_Zark]

It IS "the end of the world" for those of us who are not fond of giving up such info . . . that "Why do I care if they get my fingerprints? I already gave them up before. No big deal!" line of thought just pisses me off.

In your case, I understand. I feel the same way about cell phone apps, of which I have few installed. I abhor the rampant free data mining by apps, with the data being sold by those collecting it.

But I digress . . .

Please explain to me what difference it makes in my situation if ATF already has 14 sets of that information from former Forms 1 and 4 applications, in addition to my prints taken when I enlisted in '72?

And no, we should not have to do so, 'Murica and "shall not be infringed, motherfukker" and all that. Yet here we are, and because "follow the money" NFA's no going away, so that discussion's not on the table.

Noah

[Walleye Hunter]

In your case, I understand. I feel the same way about cell phone apps, of which I have few installed. I abhor the rampant free data mining by apps, with the data being sold by those collecting it.

But I digress . . .

Please explain to me what difference it makes in my situation if ATF already has 14 sets of that information from former Forms 1 and 4 applications, in addition to my prints taken when I enlisted in '72?

And no, we should not have to do so, 'Murica and "shall not be infringed, motherfukker" and all that. Yet here we are, and because "follow the money" NFA's no going away, so that discussion's not on the table.

Noah

It's all about the revenue stream.

[bogey1]

In your case, I understand. I feel the same way about cell phone apps, of which I have few installed. I abhor the rampant free data mining by apps, with the data being sold by those collecting it.

But I digress . . .

Please explain to me what difference it makes in my situation if ATF already has 14 sets of that information from former Forms 1 and 4 applications, in addition to my prints taken when I enlisted in '72?

And no, we should not have to do so, 'Murica and "shall not be infringed, motherfukker" and all that. Yet here we are, and because "follow the money" NFA's no going away, so that discussion's not on the table.

Noah

NFA isn't going anywhere. Its going to expand. imo

[JenniferG]

The real question to my mind, given the upcoming midterms, is IF the R side of the coin can manage to retake the house or senate or both, ***can something be done about this***? I'm not saying that they may want to do so - hell, that's giving them too much credit. But 'could' this bs be kicked to the curb by congress in some way?

The R's will do nothing as they always do nothing. They are the other side of the marxist coin at this point.

[JaySmith]

[bogey1]

You must be a mind reader. I was going to post something similar today, and I never saw or heard of this.^^^

[EFK]

Well just to keep yapping - this is a picture perfect example of the bureaucratic state run amok.

How can a bureaucratic agency composed of unelected assholes... er, officials, usurp the power of congress to essentially make a new "law" that will create a felony offense punishable by law enforcement?

They're puling it out of their asses and relying upon fear and ignorance.

[icp4life162005]

Well just to keep yapping - this is a picture perfect example of the bureaucratic state run amok.

How can a bureaucratic agency composed of unelected assholes... er, officials, usurp the power of congress to essentially make a new "law" that will create a felony offense punishable by law enforcement?

They're puling it out of their asses and relying upon fear and ignorance.

Which is why I won't comply.

They do t have the authority, nor I the fucks to give.