Proposed ATF 80% rules and kits

[ShadeRabbit]

Why look, a bunch of attorney generals, including our very own Shitpiro, filed a brief in support of the ATF. On the very same day as the ATF issued their "clarification" on their Final-Oops-Not-So-Final Rule they issued in August. I feel so much better knowing that these Attorney Generals are conspiri, errrr, I mean "coordinating" with the ATF to keep me "safe."


Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516590307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2022

"INTRODUCTION AND INTEREST OF AMICI STATES
The District of Columbia and the States of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and the States of California, Colorado, Connecticut,Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington(collectively, the *Amici States*), file this brief as amici curiae in support of defendants-appellants and their authority to enact the Final Rule at issue. See Definition of *Frame or Receiver* and Identification of Firearms, 87 Fed. Reg.
24652 (Apr. 26, 2022)"

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/atta...20as-filed.pdf

[akley88]

Why look, a bunch of attorney generals, including our very own Shitpiro, filed a brief in support of the ATF. On the very same day as the ATF issued their "clarification" on their Final-Oops-Not-So-Final Rule they issued in August. I feel so much better knowing that these Attorney Generals are conspiri, errrr, I mean "coordinating" with the ATF to keep me "safe."


Case: 22-11071 Document: 00516590307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/27/2022

"INTRODUCTION AND INTEREST OF AMICI STATES
The District of Columbia and the States of New Jersey and Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and the States of California, Colorado, Connecticut,Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan,Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington(collectively, the *Amici States*), file this brief as amici curiae in support of defendants-appellants and their authority to enact the Final Rule at issue. See Definition of *Frame or Receiver* and Identification of Firearms, 87 Fed. Reg.
24652 (Apr. 26, 2022)"

https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/atta...20as-filed.pdf

makes sense, cause he tried that crap himself before and the courts said no.

[eyecanshoot]

The only reason the government cares is because enforcement exposes their illegal data collection.

[Emptymag]

If there's a more recent/more relevant thread where this should have gone, I couldn't find it.


"ATF Suffers Big Loss with Final Rule on Frames and Receivers!"
Sorry, no summary - I haven't finished watching it.

[JaySmith]

If there's a more recent/more relevant thread where this should have gone, I couldn't find it.


"ATF Suffers Big Loss with Final Rule on Frames and Receivers!"
Sorry, no summary - I haven't finished watching it.

YES, the one with the huge cans is back. Blond hair, blue eyes, and big cans.

[Walleye Hunter]

YES, the one with the huge cans is back. Blond hair, blue eyes, and big cans.

But she has big hands.

[JaySmith]

But she has big hands.

I didn't even realize she had hands.

[ShadeRabbit]

0:45 to skip the coffee ad. Glock suing Polymer 80, something about patent infringement of the slide release lever (I'm not a Glock guy) on G43, G43x, and G48. All I can say is poor timing on Glock's part.

[Emptymag]

I hate you. I didn't realize it was THAT asshole.
Now Youtube is gonna "suggest" all his vids for me to view. Ugh.
I clicked "back" as soon as I saw him, but it's probably too late.

[ExFlyinguy]

I hate you. I didn't realize it was THAT asshole.
Now Youtube is gonna "suggest" all his vids for me to view. Ugh.
I clicked "back" as soon as I saw him, but it's probably too late.

I feel ya, but there is an option to click "don't recommend this channel" and it even works better than the poofa ignore button 🙂