Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    carbon cty, Pennsylvania
    (Carbon County)
    Posts
    2,129
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    Ecclesiastes 10:2 ...........

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks Cty, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    68
    Posts
    5,950
    Rep Power
    21474857

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    Quote Originally Posted by ImminentDanger View Post
    Future Looks So Bright For 2nd Amendment, It's Gotta Wear Shades
    By Michael Dorstewitz - 05 November 2021
    https://www.newsmax.com/michaeldorst...05/id/1043489/



    As if on queue --- Here is proof of my postulation above that our 2A Rights will be construed as granted by the US Supreme Court.

    And even more disturbing, if the above article is correctly reporting the Roberts / Fletcher interchange, Chief Justice Roberts' statement that the US Constitution 'gives you that right' is WHOLLY WRONG and promulgates that WRONG-HEADED idea. The Bill of Rights (attached to the Constitution) is intended to deliberately RECOGNIZE that our Rights pre-exist - It does not create those Rights. It demands that the government respect those pre-existing Rights.

    This is a HUGE distinction - One that is far too often overlooked.

    ...
    They want to promulgate that belief. SCOTUS is nothing more than the rubber stamp for the Reich.

    Separation of Powers? LMFAO
    Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Cranberry Twp, Pennsylvania
    (Butler County)
    Posts
    964
    Rep Power
    21474846

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    NYSRPA v. Bruen, Part 2!

    -Brandon


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ...
    (York County)
    Posts
    1,724
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    Quote Originally Posted by pens87pgh View Post
    NYSRPA v. Bruen, Part 2!
    Until there are some actual penalties for politicians who WILLINGLY MAKE UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS and for their prosecutors, the liberal left will continue to IGNORE COURT RULINGS WITH WHICH THEY DISAGREE! Or, as in this case, simply reapply the unconstitutional concepts with different words to accomplish the same unconstitutional ends.

    ...

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    JT, Pennsylvania
    (Carbon County)
    Posts
    204
    Rep Power
    1953252

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    They should be pulled right from their state assembly and charged. Or at least everyone who voted yes should be served with Papers for 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights, right there at the scene of their crime. They are knowingly continuing to violate our civil rights. Qualified immunity should be gone for them.

    The plaintiffs in the case should legally go after these criminal legislators directly. Might wake a few up.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Young

    So according to this, it seems like someone arrested under the new law would have standing, and could file a 1983 claim against those who passed, or try*s to enforce, what should eventually be ruled unconstitutional? They passed the new laws after, and contrary to the Bruen ruling.

    *Young contended that he was merely acting for the state of Minnesota when he sought to enforce its laws. The Court disagreed, holding that when a state official does something that is unconstitutional, the official cannot possibly be doing it in the name of the state, because the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution means that the Constitution overrides all the laws of the states, invalidating any contrary laws. Therefore, when a state official attempts to enforce an unconstitutional law, that individual is stripped of his official character. He becomes merely another citizen who can constitutionally be brought before a court by a party seeking injunctive relief.*

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    JT, Pennsylvania
    (Carbon County)
    Posts
    204
    Rep Power
    1953252

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    gov.uscourts.nynd.134455.1.0.pdf

    Reading the actual case filed here, there are 6 separate 1983 claims made against the defendants listed below. That’s great, but they should also include the legislators that passed this as well.

    KEVIN P. BRUEN, in his official capacity )
    as Superintendent of the New York State Police, ) and ) ) RICHARD J. MCNALLY, JR., in his official ) capacity as Justice of the New York Supreme ) Court, Third Judicial District, and Licensing ) Officer for Rensselaer County,

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ercildoun, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,017
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: NYSRPA v. Bruen – SCOTUS Concealed Carry Case - Oral Arguments 11/3/21

    Until the communists are swept from the field they will continue to do communist things.
    We now live in an era which future generations will refer to as “the Great Deception”

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. SCOTUS NY Oral arguments.
    By Justin///M in forum National
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: December 4th, 2019, 11:00 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: October 9th, 2013, 03:16 PM
  3. NJ permit to carry-oral arguments at 3rd Circuit
    By press1280 in forum National
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 15th, 2013, 06:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •