Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: .223/5.56

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    next to my neighbor, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    11,394
    Rep Power
    21474862

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by GOYABEAN View Post
    Unless it's chambered in .223 Wylde
    Correct.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    New Tripoli, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Posts
    1,351
    Rep Power
    21474841

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by bogey1 View Post
    Correct.
    I purchased a 7.5 .223 Wylde BCA upper next on list is 10.5 .223 Wylde upper but don't want it to be side charger.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    7,560
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Ok, so you load.308 differently than 7.62 but do you use the same dies and oal?
    Fuck joe biden and the ho beside him

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sterling, Pennsylvania
    (Wayne County)
    Posts
    5,681
    Rep Power
    21474855

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter View Post
    Ok, so you load.308 differently than 7.62 but do you use the same dies and oal?
    Same dies.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    7,560
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by Qtrborecrazy View Post
    Same dies.
    OK, so here's what I'm wondering...For some reason I get the impressing that the powder cavity is bigger on one than it is the other but the outer dimensions almost have to be the same. This could only be achieved with a thicker wall (I know, I should get my tools out and measure them). If that's the case, wouldn't neck sizing be an issue the way that bell goes through the neck while it's held in the die?
    Fuck joe biden and the ho beside him

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Richboro, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    2,420
    Rep Power
    21474847

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter View Post
    OK, so here's what I'm wondering...For some reason I get the impressing that the powder cavity is bigger on one than it is the other but the outer dimensions almost have to be the same. This could only be achieved with a thicker wall (I know, I should get my tools out and measure them). If that's the case, wouldn't neck sizing be an issue the way that bell goes through the neck while it's held in the die?
    It is a thicker wall (in the powder area). The external dimensions and the neck neck thickness have to the same. technically military brass has less capacity than commercial cases but in reality the difference in powder charge is usually less than developing a load for different rifles with different freebores.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Raccoon City, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,237
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    Quote Originally Posted by bogey1 View Post
    Supposedly you cant use 556 in a gun thats chambered for 223, it has to be marked 556,
    but you can use 223 in it if its marked 556
    if anyone can post actual proof of a .223 chamber failing on a 5.56 round i would be immensely appreciative
    I have spent litterally days searching and found nada.
    From what i can tell from this research is SAAMI and NATO measure chamber pressures at different points and this is the reason for the Eggspurts telling you not to do it. Basically comparing apples to banannas

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    7,560
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    The only malfunction that I have heard of is 5.56 brass getting stuck in the.223 chamber.
    Fuck joe biden and the ho beside him

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Fayetteville, Pennsylvania
    (Franklin County)
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    The brass headstamp does not matter when reloading. You can use 5.56 brass to load .223 Rem, just load it to .223 specs.

    The only real difference is the powder charge applied to the case. You're not going to pop a .223 case loading it with 5.56 data or vice versa. Some say the case volume is slightly smaller in NATO cases, but I've never noticed any significant difference.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    North Penn area, Pennsylvania
    Age
    61
    Posts
    4,621
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: .223/5.56

    I seem to recall reading that, 5.56 and 7.62 NATO cases CAN BE a bit on the thick side due to the fact that it MIGHT BE linked for machine gun use. Or was that commercial cases are on the thin side?

    This was even a valid point in surplus 30-06 ammo and USGI cases did normally weigh more than commercial. Lots of the grand old gun writers and wildcatters pointed this out often. Thicker brass , less capacity , possibility of high pressure.

    Would have to see official NATO and SAAMI specifications/drawings side by side.
    I don't speak English , I talk American!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •