Take time comment on ATF's Proposed redefinition of a firearm

[buckengr]

Also, doesn't matter if you own an 80% receiver or arm brace or not, everyone should comment. This receiver redefinition goes way beyond just 80% frames and stands to redefine a whole bunch of parts as receivers requiring FFL transfer, background checks, serialization, etc. The days of any home build or home assembly or ordering a spare upper or parts will be gone for good.

Please comment. Everytown and the anti-gunners will, so we all MUST, or lose without a fight.

[zachomega]

If you have commented in the last 43 days, then this is the same proposed rule for receiver definition change and indefinite retention of 4473 records (i.e. registry precursors) by FFLs. There are 47 more days left in the comment period to make a comment, so don't delay for long if you haven't.

The proposed rule banning braces is a separate rule and requires a separate comment. Any comments made about that back in December don't count for this. You must write another comment about braces during the current window.

I thought so. Thanks for the detailed response. I've already commented on both of the proposed rules.

-Zach

[Sblzrd65]

Also, doesn't matter if you own an 80% receiver or arm brace or not, everyone should comment. This receiver redefinition goes way beyond just 80% frames and stands to redefine a whole bunch of parts as receivers requiring FFL transfer, background checks, serialization, etc. The days of any home build or home assembly or ordering a spare upper or parts will be gone for good.

Please comment. Everytown and the anti-gunners will, so we all MUST, or lose without a fight.

This exactly.