Results 1 to 10 of 58
Threaded View
-
June 8th, 2021, 12:21 PM #14Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 480
- Rep Power
- 21474840
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
It's not gobbledygook because they know exactly what they are doing and the intention here is clearly a back-door approach to rendering problematic most brace designs on the market.
Their disdain and snark is evident right in sentence two:
"The proposed rule outlines the factors ATF would consider when evaluating firearms equipped with a purported "stabilizing brace..."
The deliberate use of that word alone is a shot across the bow.Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
Similar Threads
-
ATF proposed rule to change Definition of “Frame or Receiver”
By djeuch in forum NationalReplies: 95Last Post: August 19th, 2021, 11:45 AM -
Illinois: medical marijuana patients must surrender guns under proposed rule
By PocketProtector in forum NationalReplies: 20Last Post: January 24th, 2014, 09:24 PM -
Proposed new rule for Classifieds....
By Delkal in forum Support & SuggestionsReplies: 43Last Post: June 5th, 2013, 10:25 AM
Bookmarks