Results 1 to 10 of 26
-
April 16th, 2021, 11:36 AM #1
Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
Some background: in 2011, I (a PRNY resident) attempted to apply for my LTCF in Bradford county. I was turned away, told that the references on my application must be from Bradford. Not knowing the law then as I do now, I simply went over to Susquehanna county and applied there. Permit was received a few weeks later.
As my renewal approached in 2016, I heard that border county sheriffs were refusing to accept applications from NY residents. So I contacted GunLawyer001. He helped me create a plan for how I was going to push against this unlawful behavior. I went to the Susquehanna sheriff's office, and as expected, they refused to accept my application. I spoke with Sheriff Lance Benedict and explained how these were unlawful actions that I would challenge in court, if required. He recognized this reality but appeared unwilling to back off. After about half an hour of discussion, he asked me to wait 2-4 weeks before going forward with a lawsuit, as he was in talks with the Broome County Sheriff for a gentleman's reciprocity agreement. Two weeks later, Sheriff Benedict called me and told me to come on down with my application. While this was a positive resolution in some respects, the reality was that he was continuing his unlawful behavior, but had removed my standing to do something about it.
Some background threads:
https://www.nyfirearms.com/threads/n.../#post-1331849
https://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=301862
So, here we are in 2021, and I am up for renewal again. The same unlawful policies are in place - not accepting applications from NY residents who are not from Broome County - but I still can't do anything about that. However, this time, the renewal notification included not only the LTCF application, but a second page asking additional questions about prior addresses and employers, going back 10 years. As we all know, §6109(C) is quite clear on this:
Issuing authorities shall use only the application form prescribed by the Pennsylvania State Police.
When I arrived at the office and handed them my renewal application, they asked for the other form. I stated that I had received it but was declining to fill it out. The office assistant told me it was required, so I told her that the sheriff could request the information, but could not legally require it. She then asked the deputy nearby to intervene, and he in turn called out Chief Deputy Jon Record (this is all following the same pattern that it did in 2016). This time, Chief Deputy Record did not challenge me or attempt to goad an inappropriate reaction out of me, as he did in 2016. He stated that it was the sheriff's requirement, I told him it was unlawful for the sheriff to require it under §6109(C), and he responded that he was familiar with the law (from my experience in 2016, I believe he is). Chief Deputy Record then asked Sheriff Benedict to step in.
Just like in 2016, Sheriff Benedict explained his position. When I pushed back against him, he asked me to step into his office. Again, this is like a broken record. I stated the relevant section of PA law and he pulled it up to review it. He quickly realized I was correct, but that didn't mean he was happy about it. I spent some time trying to smooth things over a bit, as it was clear he was somewhat personally offended. He made comments along the lines of "maybe I'll just shut down NY permits altogether" and "maybe I'll just make people wait 44 days before I issue." I explained that I understood his position, and that he was well within his rights to make people wait 44 days, but that I felt such vindictive behavior should be far beneath the chief law enforcement officer of Susquehanna County. That I was not out of line, or being disrespectful, for expecting law enforcement officers to obey the law. That I understand and empathize with his position but that the proper venue for him to seek change was the legislature, not the citizens.
In the end, while I think I smoothed things over a bit, it was clear that he was still pissed. But I walked out the door with my renewed LTCF.
For the record, Sheriff Benedict says he is pro-2A, and I believe him. While his refusal to accept non-resident applications is clearly unlawful, his reasons for doing so (briefly, he is unable to conduct background checks he considers sufficient, for non-residents) are not entirely without merit. And, twice now, when challenged regarding an unlawful policy, he has acquiesced. Furthermore, the fact that he has repeatedly taken the time to listen and respond to my concerns is a very good thing. I wish he would follow the law to the letter, but I understand why he has taken the positions he has.
I will say this: I was much less nervous challenging the Sheriff this time around. I guess the more you do it, the easier it gets.
Here's hoping my 2026 renewal occurs without strife. I'll report back then.Last edited by OwnTheRide; April 16th, 2021 at 01:00 PM.
-
April 16th, 2021, 04:29 PM #2Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Location
-
Montco,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Posts
- 864
- Rep Power
- 21474846
-
April 16th, 2021, 05:09 PM #3
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
Nice going to you and Gunlawyer.
-
April 16th, 2021, 05:12 PM #4
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
I appreciate you being willing to challenge a "pro-gun" but arrogant sheriff. We need more like you! His "concerns" about non-residents are already addressed by statute in 2 ways.
First, they are required to hold a license from their home state, if offered, which arguably would include it's own background check. So, in reality, non-residents could potentially be subject to more "investigation" than residents.
Second, §6109(j) provides the sheriff with immunity if some misconduct occurs involving someone to whom a LTCF was issued, so long as they comply with the stipulated procedures in doing so.
(j) Immunity.--A sheriff who complies in good faith with this section shall be immune from liability resulting or arising from the action or misconduct with a firearm committed by any individual to whom a license to carry a firearm has been issued.Get your "Guns Save Lives" stickers today! PM for more info.
-
April 17th, 2021, 06:18 AM #5
-
April 17th, 2021, 07:48 AM #6Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 476
- Rep Power
- 21474840
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
-
April 17th, 2021, 08:48 AM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Dauphin County,
Pennsylvania
(Dauphin County) - Posts
- 349
- Rep Power
- 3509074
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
Thank you for posting.
Thank you for taking a stand.
A question that I ask folks in these "situations" --- Are you recording these in-person oral conversations with elected officials (the Sheriff), and county LE employees paid with TAX money?
Please don't answer if it hinders the progress you're trying to make. If you're not, discuss with a lawyer before doing so.
-
April 19th, 2021, 01:26 PM #8
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
No, he (or any sheriff) cannot. If my understanding is correct, it goes even further than that actually: references are not actually required. Yes, there is a spot on the form for them, but "no references" is not a valid reason for LTCF denial (must be nice to be in a shall-issue state!). So, not only can they not require references from certain locations, they cannot require references, period.
I am not a lawyer, this is just something I have gleaned from these boards over the years.
-
April 19th, 2021, 01:32 PM #9
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
Don't they run the same basic background check on a non-resident as is done on a PA resident? I don't understand the Sheriff's argument.
"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Gman106
"Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the face." - Mike Tyson
"Get the hell out of my way." - John Galt
-
April 19th, 2021, 01:34 PM #10
Re: Challenge the Sheriff (again): 2021 Susquehanna County Non-Res Renewal Report
A little bit of an update:
As mentioned in the OP, despite barely-veiled threats to wait 45 days, I did receive my renewed LTCF while in the office on Friday. It is my understanding that Susquehanna County does not contact references for LTCF renewals (this is based on what a deputy told me in 2016, and the fact that none of my references were called then) . But, today, one of my references told me that he was contacted by the sheriff's office today... three days after my LTCF was renewed.
That's... odd, though I do not think there is anything in the law preventing the sheriff from calling references after approving a renewal. It suggests to me that the sheriff is seeking ways to retaliate, which would be absolutely terrible and completely out of line.
Look, I understand the perspective that I am some know-it-all NYer trying to tell the sheriff of another state how to do his job, but I do expect a sheriff to be above vindictive behavior and/or retaliation.
Similar Threads
-
Blair County Sheriff's Office - LTCF Renewal Letters. Oops!
By TechAlG in forum Concealed CarryReplies: 2Last Post: September 5th, 2020, 10:56 PM -
Permit to Carry denied by Susquehanna County Sheriff
By Damage control in forum GeneralReplies: 314Last Post: August 18th, 2019, 06:33 PM -
LTCF Renewal / Lancaster County Sheriff's Office
By iMoses14 in forum Concealed & Open CarryReplies: 11Last Post: July 19th, 2015, 05:53 PM -
susquehanna county
By jesterking in forum SusquehannaReplies: 13Last Post: June 15th, 2014, 08:58 PM -
A Good FFL in Susquehanna County
By temporaryscars in forum ShopsReplies: 1Last Post: January 18th, 2013, 12:19 AM
Bookmarks