Results 1 to 10 of 36
-
December 23rd, 2020, 08:41 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 269
- Rep Power
- 2593728
ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
"Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further Department of Justice review, the notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces’,” that was published on December 18, 2020. 85 FR 82516. As explained in the notice, the proposed guidance was not a regulation. The notice informed and invited comment from the industry and public on a proposed guidance prior to issuing a final guidance document.
The withdrawal of the guidance does not change any law, regulation, or other legally binding requirement"
https://princelaw.files.wordpress.co..._signature.pdf
-
December 23rd, 2020, 08:48 PM #2
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
they got a nice starter list on who to chase down...
the GD guntubers are worst than the yentas on the View - blah blah blah we won!, look at meee... just carry, stack deep, and stfu
-
December 23rd, 2020, 08:54 PM #3
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
Not to be thick headed, but they are withdrawing the notice... As in they are no longer pursuing pistol braces as an nfa item or?
I hate that i have to ask. But they make everything else unnecessarily complicated, so why would this be any different?
And yes, even if they are withdrawing... I'm sure it is just regrouping.
-ZachMy feedback thread: https://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=315316
-
December 23rd, 2020, 09:10 PM #4Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
-
Richboro,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 3,068
- Rep Power
- 21474851
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
I guess they realized this proposed law was totally arbitrary and would cause 100 lawsuits. And everyone who already has a pistol or even a bare receiver would just need to buy the cheapest brace on the market and they could get a free SBR.
-
December 23rd, 2020, 09:28 PM #5
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
The battle may be won, but the war is definitely not over.
-
December 23rd, 2020, 09:45 PM #6
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
Yes, Jared did a show on this:
Val W. Finnell, MD, MPH | Pennsylvania Director, Gun Owners of America | 703-321-8585
-
December 23rd, 2020, 11:14 PM #7
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
Well, to everyone on here who said letters, phone calls, etc are of no use...Thanks for nothing. You were at least temporarily wrong. Revolution will not be required today.
To everyone who did reach out to your representatives or the ATF...Thank you. You at least bought us some time.
-
December 24th, 2020, 12:13 AM #8Active Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- Location
-
Everett,
Pennsylvania
(Bedford County) - Posts
- 140
- Rep Power
- 5683751
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
Probably realized anything pertaining to braces could just be included in Sleepy Joe's EO on his first day.
-
December 24th, 2020, 07:45 AM #9
-
December 24th, 2020, 09:46 AM #10Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
-
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 68
- Rep Power
- 970079
Re: ATF Withdrawals Notice and Request for Comment!
As of this moment, the document is still posed and shows the site is still taking comments.
I could be wrong, but something "smells bad" about the ATF retreating on this.
Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with *Stabilizing Braces*
A Notice by the Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau on 12/18/2020
This document has a comment period that ends in 11 days. (01/04/2021)
Bookmarks