Results 101 to 110 of 185
-
December 4th, 2020, 06:35 PM #101
-
December 4th, 2020, 06:48 PM #102
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
For the last time.....If it doesn’t apply in court.....IT DONT MEAN SHIT. So you can show all the video, have all the eyewitnesses, have secret recordings. If a court doesn’t deem it credible.....IT DOESNT MEAN SHIT. Do I believe that there was zero fraud, of course I don’t. But with without verifying evidence, of wide spread fraud, that a court finds credible......IT DOESN'T MEAN SHIT. And if nobody is going to “Dive in”, then The Biden/Harris era win begin on Jan 20th. I will tell you like I told Hillary fans four years ago.......You ain’t gotta like it, but ya best learn to live with it cause it’s happening.
Don’t like me ???? Tough, I don’t give a flying f@@k about ya.
-
December 4th, 2020, 07:50 PM #103
-
December 4th, 2020, 07:54 PM #104
-
December 4th, 2020, 08:16 PM #105
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Not sure what the burden of proof is for a state legislature to put the brakes on certification. The GA video may just be enough.
Edit: or not
Georgia county recertifies election results, rejecting fraud claims tied to viral video
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/geo...n-county-videoLast edited by lager1829; December 4th, 2020 at 08:28 PM.
-
December 4th, 2020, 08:32 PM #106
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
The Never Trumper had his ox gored and is trying to get back at you mass of idiots that voted for Trump because you are too stupid to know what's good for you. It's the same old story different signature.
Corruption is the default behavior of government officials. JPC
-
December 4th, 2020, 09:11 PM #107
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Well, you've hit on something there. If you can pack a court with judges who will make sure the 'law' flows only one way, then you're right. All the 'proof' in the world won't mean shit.
The PA Supreme Court ignored the voting statutes and made up their own law.
The NJ Supreme Court ignored the firearm statute on permit issuance and made up their own law.
Consequently, they both demonstrated that they think they are above the law, and above accountability to us.
If you think we are now going to accept verdicts from courts like this as authoritative, guess again.
And no, some of us are not going to 'learn to live with it'. And that will mean shit.Last edited by 45Doll; December 5th, 2020 at 03:05 PM.
"You gotta be alive to get paid."
-
December 4th, 2020, 09:16 PM #108
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
-
December 4th, 2020, 09:22 PM #109
-
December 4th, 2020, 09:28 PM #110
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Similar Threads
-
PA AG Josh Shapiro Thinks The Election Outcome Is Pre-Determined
By Spirit of 76 in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 19Last Post: November 4th, 2020, 04:18 PM
Bookmarks