Results 51 to 60 of 185
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:11 PM #51
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:50 PM #52
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Not sure why any blood would flow.
The left is the ones who would spill blood - they have been doing it for months now.
I don't see conservatives "peacefully protesting" any time soon.I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:50 PM #53
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:56 PM #54
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:57 PM #55
-
December 2nd, 2020, 08:00 PM #56
-
December 2nd, 2020, 08:53 PM #57Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
North West,
Pennsylvania
(Erie County) - Posts
- 1,537
- Rep Power
- 0
-
December 2nd, 2020, 09:15 PM #58
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
This guy must be a stand up comic. No country in the developed world allows vote by mail and the few that do have strict ID requirements for the very reason of the fraud that went on with this election. Then again elections in the CCP aren't part of scenery and if something isn't done to put an end to this fraud there won't be any elections in the US either. Political leaders will be chosen by the ruling elite which is what just happened. We're back to feudalism.
Corruption is the default behavior of government officials. JPC
-
December 2nd, 2020, 09:57 PM #59Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
-
412/724,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 1,654
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
I know it’s a populist thing to do: does Florida count? Or Utah? Or Ohio? As “countries?”
Or just the places where the orange man lost the mail in vote?
Can you explain how in person voting where you sign something and someone who doesn’t know you sort of decides whether your signature matches differs materially from how you mail in a ballot and someone who doesn’t know you decides if your signature matches?
My issue with most of these conversations remains that everyone who is convinced the fix was supposedly in has either no working idea of how elections in the state or country are run. And lord knows, I won’t question the support of Russia from a trump supporter. Playing footsie with Putin is all y’all.
-
December 3rd, 2020, 12:51 AM #60
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
In today's world of constant lying, where the truth is subjected to so much manipulation and massaged to fit the preferred narrative, it is difficult to know what to believe as a verifiable reality.
Yet, the very fact that there are intentional efforts to create and maintain this constant morphing of reality, is proof that those people want you to be subservient to their control, due to the chaos they create thru misinformation, disinformation, lack of information and misdirection of attention.
If you are stabbed in the back, you may never see the knife. That doesn't mean it's not there. You may only feel and see the effects of the stabbing, but your life is still on the line, even though you can't put your hand on the weapon, nor see your assailant.
Like so much of the coronavirus panic, the swirling whirlwind of BS around this election stinks to high heaven. The very same type distortions of the truth, by misinformation, disinformation, lack of information and misdirection of attention, are being utilized to prevent clarity regarding the election facts. That whirlwind has led to outrageous control being forced upon people, in the name of safety from the virus. 2A supporters, especially, should see and recognize this strategy for what it is. The election is proving that the strategy of whirlwind chaos and confusion is effective in other ways as well.
Every true American should want a clean & verifiable election. Those who don't want that, or don't care to fight for that, are simply UnAmerican. Not that that is uncommon these days. Very few see the principles of America are worth fighting for. What Principles? Freedom and self-determination, which requires truthfulness and integrity.
Every election official (and any government official) who is found derelict in their duty to protect the truthfulness & integrity of the ballots, in addition to jail time, should be banned for life from ever holding a position (local, state, federal) that is paid by the citizenry or provides any governmental services. These offenses are that serious.
Elections should have the same expectation of clarity & integrity as a jury. Those who are responsible for examining & counting the votes should be sequestered from any outside activity. During the period of time designated for this process, those involved should have no outside contacts or influences, in the same way the jury is to be protected from influence and prevented from such solicitation. ONLY those ballots that are directly and concurrently examined and counted by opposing representatives (like in a jury trial which has both a prosecutor and defense attorney) should be declared valid. Those that are disputed by the first examination should be subjected to a second, independent examination before they can be validated.
After this election, it should be obvious to any sane person that chaos & confusion destroy integrity. Unless every election process is designed to minimize the opportunity for fraud and following every election the examining & counting of ballots is done with checks & balances, to find and toss any fraudulent voting, our nation will be destroyed thru the utilization of the whirlwind strategy of chaos and confusion.
...
Similar Threads
-
PA AG Josh Shapiro Thinks The Election Outcome Is Pre-Determined
By Spirit of 76 in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 19Last Post: November 4th, 2020, 04:18 PM
Bookmarks