Results 61 to 70 of 185
-
December 3rd, 2020, 01:50 AM #61Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
-
Somewhere else,
Pennsylvania
(Cambria County) - Posts
- 2,757
- Rep Power
- 21474855
-
December 3rd, 2020, 09:42 AM #62
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Isn't it possible that Biden won? In PA they want to throw out mail in ballots for being unconstitutional. I'll bet hundreds of thousands of legitimate, law abiding people voted that way. Should we throw out their votes on some bullshit technicality? As much as I want Trump to win, that's just not right. Also how is it every time someone says something not in line with Trump they are a "deep state traitor". Could this be a huge conspiracy, sure. Problem is only one person can keep a secret. I doubt a couple thousand can. Biden is your president like it or not.
-
December 3rd, 2020, 09:57 AM #63
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
-
December 3rd, 2020, 10:24 AM #64Super Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
-
BFE,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 500
- Rep Power
- 21474845
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Are rules just guidelines now? Why even write rules anymore if nobody is going to follow them. There is testimony from poll workers and observers talking about them trucking in mystery ballots to a bunch of other statistical anomalies and anybody with half a brain knows a guy that couldn't draw 10 people to an event isn't going to be more popular than Obama was by the tune of 10 million more votes.
https://spectator.us/reasons-why-the...eply-puzzling/
-
December 3rd, 2020, 10:55 AM #65
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Universal mail in voting should never have been allowed in the first place. There's no way to verify the person sending in said ballot was the one who actually received it. There's no way to tell if some one just drove down the street in Philly paying people $50 for their ballots then filling them all out and mailing them in.
The entire election process needs updated to the 21st century. I should be able to find out 1. that my vote was counted and 2. who my vote went to. No one else should be able to get this info. I don't know how to do it, but I'm sure if the eggheads in Silicon Valley took a week off from censoring conservatives and selling our personal information they could have it figured out in no time. Couple that with an ID requirement and our election would be relatively secure.
-
December 3rd, 2020, 11:03 AM #66
-
December 3rd, 2020, 11:16 AM #67
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Do not need 21st century tech to accomplish all that.
Hundreds year old tech called "paper" accomplishes all that.
Also; upon registering to vote; a voter registration card is received. That's ID. Anyone who does not present that when arriving at the polls; does not get to vote.--ET
-
December 3rd, 2020, 11:59 AM #68
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
I'll bring this over from another thread because the comment I made there applies here:
And I'll bring this comment forward (from 4 years ago in a thread that is 7 years old - Founders Intention for Government) because it also applies here:
I continue to be amazed that people think those who choose policies (in public or private life) that destroy the founding principles and erode our basic Rights actually have the best interests of America on their minds. They are not simply working in a different way to implement the founding principles. They are, in fact, working to destroy those principles. After the past four years of constant attacks on those who try to promote the founding principles, of individualism, self-reliance and personal responsibility, anyone who continues to believe those attackers have the best interest of America in mind are simply deluded.
Conspiracy? No, it does not exist in the normal sense. But coordinated and/or independent cooperative acts of attack are certainly happening. Copycats and anarchists are both working for the same goals, with the same attitude.
I have no faith that The Government in any of it's forms still work For The People. Every branch is filled with those who believe in the Government Controlling The People. This attitude permeates every level of government from your local county commissioners right up thru the state into the federal level. We have to BEG for our RIGHTS (now seen as privileges) to be respected. That is destructive of America.
And, the Supreme Court, that is supposed to protect The People from their elected government representatives taking control from them, has demonstrated a willingness to simply join in the inter-branch struggle for supremacy of control. They have not fulfilled their role to Protect The People or to protect the founding principles.
It is a very disgusting situation we are now in. And few have the clarity of thought to recognize the reality of the danger.
...
-
December 3rd, 2020, 12:38 PM #69Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
So Arizona did a sampling & investigated 100,000 of the ballots in one county. 3% were found to have error..... Hmm! 3% sure is different from NO VOTER FRAUD you Dems & Libs keep lying about.
But, these people will continue silencing voices. It happens here. Those who truly care about our Nation & Constitution aren*t giving in this time. And all the truth will come out. CHEATERS don*t get rewarded. And we certainly should not give in on threat of violence, which is what you Dems love to do. You are the Party of Death! Always have been, always will be. You Dems are the Origional Nazi Party.Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
December 3rd, 2020, 12:44 PM #70Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
-
Somewhere else,
Pennsylvania
(Cambria County) - Posts
- 2,757
- Rep Power
- 21474855
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
It's not a bullshit technicality. The state representatives have the constitutional power to decide how electors are selected. The Republicans said they would expand mail-in voting, but only with signature/address/etc., verification to prevent fraud. The dems didn't like that, but republicans had majority, so that's how it passed.
Dems went to court, and lefty activist PASC eliminated verification requirements for mail-in ballots. But, COTUS clearly does not award the courts the power to decide how electors are selected. So, any mail-in vote that did not go through the verification is invalidated. The dems tried to cheat, it is blowing up in their face because their actions will have disenfranchised many voters (both living, and dead... but we'll never know because dems skirted verification).
Furthermore, our representatives wanted verification of the mail-in ballots, expressly for the purpose of avoiding fraud. Actions taken to circumvent efforts to stop fraud are... FRAUD!
Similar Threads
-
PA AG Josh Shapiro Thinks The Election Outcome Is Pre-Determined
By Spirit of 76 in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 19Last Post: November 4th, 2020, 04:18 PM
Bookmarks