Results 41 to 50 of 185
-
December 2nd, 2020, 02:53 PM #41
-
December 2nd, 2020, 03:14 PM #42
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Here is what actually happened: Republicans trusted the election process until it became clear what the outcome was.There are two kinds of guns. Those I have acquired, and those I hope to.
-
December 2nd, 2020, 03:29 PM #43
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
DOJ Fires Back At News Orgs Claiming Voter Fraud Probes Are Over: That’s Not What AG Barr Said
The Department of Justice responded to media organizations who reported on Tuesday that the DOJ had concluded its investigation into allegations of voter fraud and had found no evidence, saying that claim was incorrect.
“Some media outlets have incorrectly reported that the Department has concluded its investigation of election fraud and announced an affirmative finding of no fraud in the election,” a DOJ spokesperson said in a statement. “That is not what the Associated Press reported nor what the Attorney General stated. The Department will continue to receive and vigorously pursue all specific and credible allegations of fraud as expeditiously as possible.”
-
December 2nd, 2020, 03:38 PM #44Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
-
412/724,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 1,654
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Among the large republican majorities who enacted it in both houses of the legislature? Among the smart ones who knew that having Trump tell people not to vote by mail in a pandemic was the electoral equivalent of actual seppuku?
People who prior to the arrival of the populist mob called themselves Republican had apprehension only because the guy at the top tried unsuccessfully to ruin the election for all of them, leastwise in PA as it pertains to mail in ballots.
-
December 2nd, 2020, 03:42 PM #45Active Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Snack Capital of the US,
Pennsylvania
(York County) - Posts
- 158
- Rep Power
- 5521017
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
I have no confidence going forward in the integrity of the process. Mail in ballots are only as trustworthy as the person(s) responsible for monitoring them. I believe that PA officials are corrupt in this regard.
-
December 2nd, 2020, 04:41 PM #46
-
December 2nd, 2020, 04:46 PM #47Grand Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
-
DeepInTheWoods,
Pennsylvania
(Warren County) - Posts
- 2,432
- Rep Power
- 21474854
-
December 2nd, 2020, 05:38 PM #48Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
-
412/724,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 1,654
- Rep Power
- 0
-
December 2nd, 2020, 06:35 PM #49
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
Voter fraud is one of those things that rarely presents itself as a neatly wrapped up gift with ribbon and a bow, ready to be gifted. The devil is in the details, the machines, the software, the people who develop a conscience after committing the fraud.
Philadelphia had a case in 1994. The fraud was so blatant and tied back directly to the Democrat running for office. A Federal judge ruled against him, after he appeared to win the election, and gave the win to his opponent. Philadelphia continues to be the corrupt city it was then, even today.
-
December 2nd, 2020, 07:02 PM #50Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
-
red lion,
Pennsylvania
(York County) - Posts
- 69
- Rep Power
- 523737
Re: Barr: No evidence of fraud that would change election outcome
If voting by mail is so secure, we can start letting FFL's do electronic background checks and send our gun to our house in the MAIL. Right?
Similar Threads
-
PA AG Josh Shapiro Thinks The Election Outcome Is Pre-Determined
By Spirit of 76 in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 19Last Post: November 4th, 2020, 04:18 PM
Bookmarks