F.O.A.C. Endorses Biden-Harris Supporter in 50th District

[Spirit of 76]

F.O.A.C. has endorsed Democrat Pam Snyder in the 50th Legislative District race, but F.O.A.C. did not stop there.

Crossing the line from a non-partisan organization that gives endorsements to political candidates into an organization that campaigns, F.O.A.C. mailed out a color mailer on Snyder's behalf.

See:


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BPu...w?usp=drivesdk


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BSO...w?usp=drivesdk

Moreover, Democrat Pam Snyder cannot be unaware of the linkage of her candidacy to the most anti-2A ticket in U.S. history.

This political linkage stands in plain sight on Route 21 in Mcclellandtown, Pennsylvania, just outside the Advanced Disposal site.

See:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jDk...w?usp=drivesdk

This poster spoke directly with Snyder's opposition, Larry Yost (R). Yost explained that he not only filled out F.O.A.C.'s lengthy questionnaire, but also that he attempted to ensure the electronic receipt of the questionnaire on numerous occasions.

Yost said he reached out to F.O.A.C., but to no avail. Yost said that he has spoken with other candidates who had difficulty with the F.O.A.C.'s receipt of completed questionnaires.

Shame on F.O.A.C. for its campaigning on a Biden supporter's behalf.

[Berncly]

Have you spoken to FOAC about this?
It would be a good idea to get their feedback on this so we get a better picture of the situation.
Bern-

[Lexington]

Would love to know more context behind this, but it doesn't look good! It's one thing to say, "Hey, this gal's all right based on the questionnaire response." It's another to send out mailers on her behalf.

Maybe FOAC is trying to hedge its bets?

[Spirit of 76]

I e-mailed F.O.A.C. my disappointment about the mailer. I received no response.

[Berncly]

Maybe our resident FOAC people can chime in when they see the thread.
If not, one of us should make some calls.
Bern-

[Lexington]

I e-mailed F.O.A.C. my disappointment about the mailer. I received no response.

Sounds like you're in the same boat as Larry Yost, then!

[Spirit of 76]

Would love to know more context behind this, but it doesn't look good! It's one thing to say, "Hey, this gal's all right based on the questionnaire response." It's another to send out mailers on her behalf.

Maybe FOAC is trying to hedge its bets?

Like you, my problem is with F.O.A.C. sending a mailer out to campaign on Snyder's behalf. I live in her district, and her present campaign is all about saying how she fights Gov. Wolf and her party for the working man. Yet, if she supports the top of an anti-2A national slate, how can she be considered pro-2A?

Yost is unequivocally pro-2A.

[Hodgie]

Would love to know more context behind this, but it doesn't look good! It's one thing to say, "Hey, this gal's all right based on the questionnaire response." It's another to send out mailers on her behalf.

Maybe FOAC is trying to hedge its bets?

If they are just going by a questionnaire Could it be she just lied on it in order to get the endorsements?

This is why you don’t take the word for any other politician or lobbyist group for gospel when it comes to something as important as your vote especially on the state and local level. Do your own research and make up your own mind and get out of the group think.

[Bang]

Strange things are happening in the political world. Gifford's rabid anti-gun org endorsed Brian FitzPatrick. His campaign manager stated he doesn't know why.

[ImminentDanger]

If they are just going by a questionnaire Could it be she just lied on it in order to get the endorsements?

This is why you don*t take the word for any other politician or lobbyist group for gospel when it comes to something as important as your vote especially on the state and local level. Do your own research and make up your own mind and get out of the group think.

LYING has become wide spread in society - and especially, WILLFUL LYING has become part of the political process. This is why it is MYOPIC to make single-cause decisions. Those who are willing to LIE TO YOUR FACE can NOT be trusted to do what they say!

You MUST look at their record and the actions they have pursued on all major issues to evaluate the validity of their claims on the issues of priority to you.

Dangerous times are upon us!

...