Results 11 to 20 of 46
-
October 20th, 2020, 05:13 AM #11Grand Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
-
Southwest,
Pennsylvania
(Washington County) - Posts
- 1,942
- Rep Power
- 21474853
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
Currently in PA, ballots with no post mark and an incorrect signature can be counted up to three days after election day. If you can't see the potential problem there, you probably don't want to.
ETA: The article above claims they must be postmarked by election day, but that is incorrect. They actually must only NOT be postmarked after election day. Ballots with no post mark are still valid.
-
October 20th, 2020, 09:09 AM #12
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
Yes, I agree. Didn’t say it’s perfect, no system is. While I see the potential for fraud, I don’t see the ACTUAL fraud. Has any county’s election board complained about wide spread fraud ??? Anyone been arrested for voter fraud ??? If it is exist, let me see it so I can denounce it. As stated earlier, this argument Of fraud is claimed by Democrats too.
Don’t like me ???? Tough, I don’t give a flying f@@k about ya.
-
October 20th, 2020, 09:30 AM #13
-
October 20th, 2020, 10:38 AM #14
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain
-
October 20th, 2020, 10:57 AM #15
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
This is precisely why it's vital to get Justice Amy Coney Barrett into her office by the election.
Thursday hopefully.Galations 6:9...And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.
Ashli Babbitt - Patriot
-
October 20th, 2020, 11:00 AM #16
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
We need to get Barrett on the Supreme Court, because Pennsylvania is going to be the next Florida with what happened in the 2000 election.
-
October 20th, 2020, 11:16 AM #17
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
What we NEED is a constitutional amendment that requires proof of citizenship in order to vote in person.
If you can't make the time to vote in person on election day, you shouldn't be voting.It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. Voltaire
-
October 20th, 2020, 12:00 PM #18Active Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
-
Bethlehem, PA,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 233
- Rep Power
- 9955187
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
As a pilot who flies all over the country, Canada, Mexico, Caribbean etc I can*t count on being home on Election Day. This year I am working October 30-November 5. So I shouldn*t be able to vote?
If you have a valid reason why you can*t vote in person, like work or illness etc you should be able to vote absentee, otherwise vote in person.
If you can stand in line at Wal Mart, HD, grocery store etc you can vote in person.
You should have to prove your identity/citizenship when voting.
-
October 20th, 2020, 12:05 PM #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
-
Bellefonte,
Pennsylvania
(Centre County) - Posts
- 413
- Rep Power
- 21474854
-
October 20th, 2020, 01:13 PM #20
Re: Supreme Court declines to block PA mail-in ballot extension
Actually he is is correct. I researched this yesterday and was quite surprised that, not by much, but Republicans do vote by mail more than Democrats. At least in other swing states. What concerns me more is "no post mark". Someone could dump a crapload of ballots and then move on.
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery." Thomas Jefferson
Similar Threads
-
U.S. Supreme Court declines to hear gun rights cases
By lager1829 in forum NationalReplies: 42Last Post: June 17th, 2020, 11:17 PM -
Fl Supreme Court Nixes "Assualt Weapons" Ballot Ban
By Defender in forum NationalReplies: 4Last Post: June 7th, 2020, 10:54 PM
Bookmarks