Results 21 to 30 of 76
Thread: 5.56 vs .300blk
-
August 29th, 2020, 12:58 PM #21
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
I shoot my .300 10.5" barrel suppressed with super sonic without hearing protection and I am not uncomfortable.
Admittedly I don't have the best of hearing as is"It seems that the Constitution is more or less guidelines than actual rules"
My feedback: http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=305685
-
August 29th, 2020, 11:12 PM #22
-
August 29th, 2020, 11:40 PM #23
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
I shoot 6.5 Grendel all the time with super and suppressed. Buddy of mines 308 is way quite with supers and suppressed. No ear pro and very comfortable.
Dont get hung up on only subs.www.Steelvalleycasting.com is your new home for coated bullets and custom ammo.
-
August 30th, 2020, 12:09 AM #24
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
I read these threads to try to understand the mind of people who have suppressor boners.
Now that I've learned that using subsonic ammo - needed to actually make it "quiet" (not silent) - reduces the effectiveness to that of a handgun, I REALLY have no interest in suppressors.
Good posts though thus far. I learned something new.I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
August 30th, 2020, 12:17 AM #25
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
Suppressors are great to make muzzle blast of "normal" ammo shooting without ear protection safe. It's nice to be on the range bench without the guy next to you just destroying your ears while shooting.
Shooting subs for the more quiet experiance in a rifle isn't for everyone but is also nice. But not a requirement by far.www.Steelvalleycasting.com is your new home for coated bullets and custom ammo.
-
August 30th, 2020, 08:57 PM #26
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
I looked into 300BLK but stayed with 5.56x45 - for 1 factor only - price. both are good rounds but at the time the 300 was 3-4 times as expensive and I don't reload (I also don't own a suppressor). Now, everything is expensive -if you can get it.
Cb Μολὼν λαβέ
-
September 1st, 2020, 02:57 PM #27Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 553
- Rep Power
- 11657996
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
223 has far better ballistics. Reason it*s helped our military kick arse & take names for over 50 years!
Remember Biden the Pedophile! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSRqaO6DXcA
-
September 1st, 2020, 04:46 PM #28Super Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
....,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 821
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
One area where I think 5.56 would have a definite advantage is if you ever had to scavenge ammo for some reason. .300 is going to be a lot harder to find.
“A Republic, if you can keep it.” - Benjamin Franklin
-
September 1st, 2020, 04:57 PM #29
Re: 5.56 vs .300blk
300 Blackout sounds WAY cooler.
5.56 needs a marketing name - like 556 NiteSlayer
Yeah... that's badass. Especially with "night" spelled all rebellious and shit. So cool.I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!
-
September 1st, 2020, 05:26 PM #30Grand Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
-
Tioga County,
Pennsylvania
(Tioga County) - Posts
- 4,959
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Similar Threads
-
300BLK Pistol
By DaveM55 in forum PistolsReplies: 1Last Post: December 31st, 2016, 05:58 PM -
300blk or 6.8
By 4tun8 in forum RiflesReplies: 28Last Post: October 14th, 2012, 09:07 PM -
Anyone reloading 300blk yet?
By fastfive0 in forum Ammunition & ReloadingReplies: 0Last Post: June 15th, 2011, 10:23 AM
Bookmarks