Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
Or this:

§ 2906. Criminal coercion.
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of criminal
coercion, if, with intent unlawfully to restrict freedom of
action of another to the detriment of the other, he threatens
to:
(1) commit any criminal offense;
(2) accuse anyone of a criminal offense;
(3) expose any secret tending to subject any person to
hatred, contempt or ridicule; or
(4) take or withhold action as an official, or cause an
official to take or withhold action.
(b) Defense.--It is a defense to prosecution based on
paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section that the
actor believed the accusation or secret to be true or the
proposed official action justified and that his intent was
limited to compelling the other to behave in a way reasonably
related to the circumstances which were the subject of the
accusation, exposure or proposed official action, as by
desisting from further misbehavior, making good a wrong done,
refraining from taking any action or responsibility for which
the actor believes the other disqualified.
(c) Grading.--Criminal coercion is a misdemeanor of the
second degree unless the threat is to commit a felony or the
intent of the actor is felonious, in which cases the offense is
a misdemeanor of the first degree.
Doesn't The Philly DA threatening Federal agents (if they deploy to Philly) with criminal prosecutions also fall under this (my reading is yes, but law is never simple English) (I'm also not talking if anyone would actually charge, just curious if I'm reading it correct).