Results 31 to 32 of 32
-
August 6th, 2019, 10:07 PM #31Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
-
Yutopia,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 3,791
- Rep Power
- 13571860
Re: obi judge says AR's are not protected by 2nd
A certain Antonin Scalia opened his Canolli hole. Raised doubts that these firearms are not covered in our rights.
Takes a real legal mind at work here. The Miller vs US decision said that sawed off shotguns were not covered because sawed offs were not used in war. Now we cannot own firearms because they may be used in war?
You can make a pretzel out of this nonsense.
-
August 6th, 2019, 10:09 PM #32Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
-
Yutopia,
Pennsylvania
(Westmoreland County) - Posts
- 3,791
- Rep Power
- 13571860
Similar Threads
-
Federal Judge Rules AR-15′s Are “Dangerous and Unusual,” Not Protected by 2A
By unclejumbo in forum NationalReplies: 171Last Post: August 27th, 2014, 07:25 PM -
protected by S&W.....picture thread.
By brian in forum Gun PicturesReplies: 51Last Post: June 10th, 2012, 02:32 PM -
RamenOmlette with cheese (protected) :D
By ViperGTS19801 in forum Gun PicturesReplies: 23Last Post: October 12th, 2011, 09:25 PM -
First ever protected meal!
By NuclearSociety in forum Gun PicturesReplies: 29Last Post: March 21st, 2011, 06:18 PM
Bookmarks