Ginsburg lying in state at SCOTUS statuary hall

**KCJones** · September 19th, 2020, 11:10 AM

To me it's pretty simple:

1) The "Biden" Rule (it's not the McConnell rule, he just followed it) is that you don't nominate/approve a SCOTUS candidate in an election year before the election (not before the transfer of power) AND that it's applicable when the White House and Senate are held by opposing parties.

2) If the Dems were in the current situation in reverse, they'd nominate/approve without hesitation.

3) I don't really give a flying F888 about 1 and 2: This is too important. Nominate and approve NOW.

**KCJones** · September 19th, 2020, 11:15 AM

Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter

Well...if it's not parody that is definitely a woman who needs 302'd.

Yes, and Yes.

We live in a world where The Onion and The Babylon Bee routinely post 'parodies' that shortly thereafter are overtaken by reality...

Even if it IS intended as a caricature, the real humor is that we all know this sort of thing really happens, there were PLENTY of examples of 'real' versions like this around 11/9/2016. Even if this one wasn't real, we all know there were real cases of it... even if the libtard in question isn't in fact stupid enough to film and post it.

**scruff** · September 19th, 2020, 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by KCJones

To me it's pretty simple:

1) The "Biden" Rule (it's not the McConnell rule, he just followed it) is that you don't nominate/approve a SCOTUS candidate in an election year before the election (not before the transfer of power) AND that it's applicable when the White House and Senate are held by opposing parties.

2) If the Dems were in the current situation in reverse, they'd nominate/approve without hesitation.

3) I don't really give a flying F888 about 1 and 2: This is too important. Nominate and approve NOW.

The Dems called the last nominee a gang rapist, and now want us to follow "norms". New rules: We win. You lose.

**claudel** · September 19th, 2020, 11:40 AM

rbg.jpg

Too soon?

**esh21167** · September 19th, 2020, 11:40 AM

Originally Posted by GunLawyer001

More recent pic:

Attachment 136942

Now that one I would have recognized.

**57springer** · September 19th, 2020, 11:48 AM

Originally Posted by claudel

rbg.jpg

Too soon?

**KCJones** · September 19th, 2020, 12:06 PM

Originally Posted by scruff

... New rules: We win. You lose.

I like those rules.

**bogey1** · September 19th, 2020, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter

Well...if it's not parody that is definitely a woman who needs 302'd.

"Some" gun laws are needed.

**MARINE DIVISION TWO** · September 19th, 2020, 12:27 PM

Nominate & Approve NOW ! Next 30 years depend on it !

**philadelphia patriot** · September 19th, 2020, 12:32 PM

Ginsburg had plenty of years to retire but didn*t to spite Trump and the republicans. She would fall asleep during hearings. Fuck her! She made a mockery of the constitution.