Results 11 to 20 of 27
-
October 16th, 2017, 09:29 AM #11
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
That might work in the Senate with legislators just starting a new term, but I don't know how well that would go over in the House where representatives are accountable every two years to a very small sliver of the population. A representative in Meridian, Mississippi doesn't answer to Massachusetts. He answers to the people in Meridian. The whole rest of the country could be clamoring for X, but if Meridian voters want Y, he's going to have to vote Y or he'll have plenty of explaining to do the next time he's in town. And if this pattern continues or this particular bill was damning enough, then he probably won't be a Congressman for very long. The government could alter polls and claim whatever it likes, but if enough locals talk they're going to realize they're getting strung along.
Maybe I just have too much faith in a system that's been corrupted over the centuries, but I don't see this as being all that easy to carry out. Congress could vote whichever way it wants, but it's going to end up paying the consequences for it.
-
October 16th, 2017, 11:11 AM #12
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
Very well said.
Everything that is wrong with our system can be corrected with a fully engaged, alert, VOTING population.
The Framers knew what they were doing, and they also warned that the system only works if the People are actively engaged.
I listen to people bitch and moan about the system being controlled by a nefarious shadowy overlord.
But those same people don't put in any effort to use the system we inherited to fix it.
No amount of Bloomberg money or Clinton criminality can stand up to an actively engaged VOTING population.
The Tea Party already proved this.
Trump already proved this.
It's time to shit or get off the pot.
Get serious about defending our Republic, or sit back and watch it destroyed.
It's a very simple choice, get involved now, or get plowed over later.How can you have any cookies if you don't drink your milk?
-
October 16th, 2017, 12:45 PM #13
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
The bills DOES include "grandfathering":
“(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.IANAL
-
October 16th, 2017, 04:11 PM #14Super Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Location
-
zelienople,
Pennsylvania
(Beaver County) - Posts
- 956
- Rep Power
- 21474845
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
The original Constitution only had people that had "skin in the game", (landowners) voting.
-
October 16th, 2017, 04:24 PM #15
-
October 16th, 2017, 05:11 PM #16
-
October 16th, 2017, 06:16 PM #17
-
October 16th, 2017, 06:19 PM #18
-
October 16th, 2017, 06:25 PM #19
Re: Bill introduced to ban magazine capacity greater than 10
I went to college with his niece Linda in the late 80's and had the privilege of meeting him a couple times toward the end of his life. I was a poli-sci major and we had some interesting conversations about politics and political theory. He was quite solicitous to chat with a young, dumb kid who thought he had a clue. What he wrote (generally and in 'troopers' both) was no accident and had a lot of thought behind it. Truly a no-BS guy, and yes, one of the greats.
DGAF
-
October 16th, 2017, 06:33 PM #20
Similar Threads
-
Thinking about something with greater mag capacity
By dk99358 in forum PistolsReplies: 33Last Post: January 21st, 2016, 05:54 AM -
Senate right-to-carry bill introduced
By doug in forum GeneralReplies: 22Last Post: February 9th, 2009, 01:40 AM -
Anti-Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)
By Ghost001 in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: April 21st, 2007, 08:26 AM
Bookmarks