Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 15 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5111213141516171819 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 202
  1. #141
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Child of the corn, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,273
    Rep Power
    21474841

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
    You have to produce the LTCF upon "lawful demand", but there's no solid definition of what that lawful demand is.

    It's not illegal to verbally lie to a PA cop, mostly (you can't falsely implicate someone else, and you can't do it in writing or under oath). So it's not a definite crime to say "no" to the at-this-moment-are-you-carrying gun question, and there are legit reasons why you might want to lie.

    It IS illegal to lie to most Federal agents, although they've made it clear that they are not similarly bound with respect to lying to us.

    I haven't heard of any cops getting fired for seizing guns simply because they aren't "registered" to you, based on the Record of Sale Database. Some lawfully-possessed guns aren't on the state's radar, you might have received them as gifts or purchases from dad or grandpa; but after you hand it over to the traffic cop and he calls in your name and the gun's make/model/serial number, I expect the govt keeps a record of that somewhere, or at least it easily could. So, registering all the off-books guns one at a time is bad for liberty, even if they don't unlawfully seize it for not being "registered".

    You aren't going to shoot the cop, so "officer safety" is moot. And a cop in semi-darkness on the side of the road manipulating unfamiliar controls to unload the gun while negligently pointing it at your face, is NOT enhancing YOUR safety.

    That being said, if you lie and they find out, it will add an ugly element to the encounter. But they aren't supposed to arrest you for that kind of lie. There's no perfect response to the question in the real world, every option carries risks, and you could end up in court trying to get your property back, or you could end up in court for some BS "obstruction" charge.
    That clears things up a bit.

    So basically the best answer to the question “do you have any weapons” is “i dont answer any questions without my lawyer present” and shut the hell up?

  2. #142
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    127.0.0.1, Pennsylvania
    (Lancaster County)
    Posts
    20,358
    Rep Power
    21474874

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    "Nothing illegal in my car, sir"

    Not always a good answer. I wrote about this before. Can you, even if it's your car be 100% sure there's nothing illegal in it? Unless you've never had another person inside, you can't be sure. Maybe the mechanic dropped a crack rock into your floor mats. Maybe you bought a used car and there's drugs stashed under the dashboard.

    Or maybe you're driving your employer's vehicle and you find this rolling around and you're crossing into NJ, MD or DC.



    Now, I wasn't crossing into those states, but I did indeed find it rolling around yesterday. It's not mine.
    Rules are written in the stone,
    Break the rules and you get no bones,
    all you get is ridicule, laughter,
    and a trip to the house of pain.

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    3,770
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by Walleye Hunter View Post
    Shouldn't that all be past tense? I thought you weren't allowed to pull anyone over any more.
    Can*t stop for a primary offense the following:
    Expired registration
    Improperly displayed reg or temp reg
    Single brake light out
    Item hanging from rear view mirror
    Minor bumper issues
    Driving with an expired inspection sticker
    Driving with an expired emission sticker

    Everything else is still enforceable as a primary violation.

    It is not hard to avoid being stopped for the above. I don*t understand how it is harder for a minority in Philadelphia to comply.

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    3,770
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
    You have to produce the LTCF upon "lawful demand", but there's no solid definition of what that lawful demand is.

    It's not illegal to verbally lie to a PA cop, mostly (you can't falsely implicate someone else, and you can't do it in writing or under oath). So it's not a definite crime to say "no" to the at-this-moment-are-you-carrying gun question, and there are legit reasons why you might want to lie.

    It IS illegal to lie to most Federal agents, although they've made it clear that they are not similarly bound with respect to lying to us.

    I haven't heard of any cops getting fired for seizing guns simply because they aren't "registered" to you, based on the Record of Sale Database. Some lawfully-possessed guns aren't on the state's radar, you might have received them as gifts or purchases from dad or grandpa; but after you hand it over to the traffic cop and he calls in your name and the gun's make/model/serial number, I expect the govt keeps a record of that somewhere, or at least it easily could. So, registering all the off-books guns one at a time is bad for liberty, even if they don't unlawfully seize it for not being "registered".

    You aren't going to shoot the cop, so "officer safety" is moot. And a cop in semi-darkness on the side of the road manipulating unfamiliar controls to unload the gun while negligently pointing it at your face, is NOT enhancing YOUR safety.

    That being said, if you lie and they find out, it will add an ugly element to the encounter. But they aren't supposed to arrest you for that kind of lie. There's no perfect response to the question in the real world, every option carries risks, and you could end up in court trying to get your property back, or you could end up in court for some BS "obstruction" charge.
    I agree with everything you said, except the bolded part. You can*t guarantee what anyone on here will do, even me. We had a couple guys with LTCF*s shoot it up on South St. in the beginning of the summer and I believe there was a guy in Montco who went ballistic and killed people after a road rage incident at a convenience store a while ago. So while a LTCF reduces, it doesn*t eliminate violence.

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    3,770
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by ray h View Post
    A cop would never says "give me your weapon", he would retrieve it himself. I believe the courts have ruled that cops can legally disarm you during a stop or Terry stop "for their safety". That said, if a cop wants to take my gun off me "for his safety", he had better take the holster with it or his ass is mine in court.
    The courts have also ruled that police can remove your cell phone from you "for their safety", but they can't access it without a warrant. So would go for a firearm, they can remove it, thereby removing any threat, but they are not allowed to access information from it, such as the serial number or the type and number of rounds. It could also be argued that removing the gun from it's holster constitutes endangerment. Play his game, as soon as he removes it from the holster start screaming "don't shoot me, please don't shoot me". Let him explain in court why he pulled a loaded gun for no reason.
    Playing stupid games on the side of the road, usually ends with winning stupid prizes on the side of the road. No matter who is playing.

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Levittown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    9,654
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    You got me officer. I have a penis, empirical evidence that I have intent to commit a rape.

    Wow. All the green lights went off on that one!
    Last edited by Bang; September 18th, 2022 at 03:33 PM.
    There are two kinds of guns. Those I have acquired, and those I hope to.

  7. #147
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    carbon cty, Pennsylvania
    (Carbon County)
    Posts
    2,308
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by Carson View Post
    Can*t stop for a primary offense the following:
    Expired registration
    Improperly displayed reg or temp reg
    Single brake light out
    Item hanging from rear view mirror
    Minor bumper issues
    Driving with an expired inspection sticker
    Driving with an expired emission sticker

    Everything else is still enforceable as a primary violation.

    It is not hard to avoid being stopped for the above. I don*t understand how it is harder for a minority in Philadelphia to comply.
    new PA law regarding your tags

    Your license plate frame is enough for police in Pa. to pull you over, court rules

    The judges found the state’s vehicle code prohibits any part of the plate from being covered, including the visitpa.com website of the state’s



    HARRISBURG — Thousands of drivers in Pennsylvania could now be at greater risk of getting pulled over by police — all because of the frame around their license plate.

    A state appellate court ruling this week affirmed the right of police officers to stop drivers if any part of their license plate is obscured. That doesn’t just include the unique combination of letters and numbers that make up a person’s license plate — but any lettering — including the visitpa.com URL — or, for that matter, the paint around it.

    Critics argue the decision, by a three-judge Superior Court panel, raises concerns about racial bias and other potential abuses of power by law enforcement, and could give police another pretext to pull over a driver for a seemingly trivial reason, among other wide-reaching and unintended consequences.

    “At a point in time when we want to do away with pretextual stops, this decision specifically opens the door to every person being stopped at the will of police for investigation,” said Philadelphia lawyer S. Philip Steinberg, who argued against the court’s decision in the case.


    A spokesperson for Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s office, which appealed the case to the state Superior Court, called that assessment “unfair.”

    The ruling, said Krasner spokesperson Dustin Slaughter, “simply confirms current case law,” and does not enable officers to employ new or different tactics when conducting traffic stops. But the ruling itself states that the decision answers a novel question before the court.

    At the heart of the decision is how to interpret the language in a section of Pennsylvania’s vehicle code that prohibits license plates from being obscured.

    The code states that it’s unlawful to display a license plate that is so dirty that its numbers and letters are illegible from a reasonable distance; or is obscured in such a way that a red light camera or toll collection system can’t read it; or “is otherwise illegible at a reasonable distance or is obscured in any manner.”

    In their ruling, the three judges seized on the phrase “or is obscured in any manner,” which they said was a catchall phrase meant to prohibit all obstructions of any part of the plate. If the legislature only wanted to prohibit just obstructions to the license plate number and issuing authority, it would have specifically done so, the panel said.

    “While we appreciate Appellee’s position that § 1332 [of the vehicle code] should be limited to the elements of a registration plate that are actually pertinent to the identification of a vehicle’s registration, that interpretation does not comport with a plain reading of the statute,” Judge Mary Jane Bowes wrote.

    The ruling stems from a case involving an April 2021 traffic stop in Philadelphia during which a police officer pulled over a car because of a partially obstructed plate. What was obstructed: the strip at the bottom of the plate that lists the website of the state’s official tourism office, visitpa.com, which standard-issue license plates in Pennsylvania include.

    During the stop, according to court documents, the officer noticed that the front seat passenger, Derrick Ruffin, was making “furtive movements,” as if to hide something, and conducted a “protective sweep” of the passenger seat. There he found a loaded revolver (which Ruffin was not licensed to carry), ammunition, and marijuana. The officer also found that the car was not registered, and that the driver did not have a license.

    Ruffin was charged with several crimes, including carrying an unlicensed firearm.

    But at a pretrial hearing last summer, a lower court suppressed the evidence the officer recovered. In its opinion, the court found that the Philadelphia police officer lacked probable cause to make the stop because the state’s vehicle code only prohibits the obstruction of a license plate number and the plate’s issuing authority. The state’s tourism website, it found, did not count toward such a violation.

    The Superior Court’s three-judge panel disagreed.
    https://www.bctv.org/2022/08/26/your...er-court-rules
    Ecclesiastes 10:2 ...........

  8. #148
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Quakertown, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    1,291
    Rep Power
    21474846

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by middlefinger View Post
    new PA law regarding your tags

    Your license plate frame is enough for police in Pa. to pull you over, court rules

    The judges found the state’s vehicle code prohibits any part of the plate from being covered, including the visitpa.com website of the state’s





    https://www.bctv.org/2022/08/26/your...er-court-rules
    Just saw this on the news...but my vehicles do not have a dealer plate surround or anything else....but I have yet to see anyone removing them on their vehicles or the tinted license plate covers either...

  9. #149
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
    (Franklin County)
    Posts
    3,607
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    So all of those people still driving around with their old registration stickers on their plates better get rid of them.
    The Hostler

  10. #150
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Warminster, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    62
    Posts
    708
    Rep Power
    21474850

    Default Re: Duty to Inform when stopped by police

    Quote Originally Posted by ray h View Post
    So all of those people still driving around with their old registration stickers on their plates better get rid of them.
    I have a River Conservation plate with over 20 years of registration stickers.
    Gotta stay awake, gotta try and shake off this creeping malaise

Page 15 of 21 FirstFirst ... 5111213141516171819 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 131
    Last Post: August 18th, 2017, 10:06 AM
  2. Replies: 28
    Last Post: January 15th, 2013, 02:03 AM
  3. Game Warden, any duty to inform, etc?
    By pennsylvaniaboy in forum Concealed & Open Carry
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: January 28th, 2012, 11:21 AM
  4. Duty to inform
    By General Geoff in forum Concealed & Open Carry
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: March 16th, 2011, 03:18 PM
  5. Duty to inform in Philly?????
    By beekay in forum Concealed & Open Carry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 17th, 2010, 01:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •