Results 11 to 20 of 61
-
December 31st, 2015, 01:49 PM #11
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
thought this was a pretty good read.
http://timesleader.com/opinion/colum...ats-no-garbage
"Unfunded pension debts that now surpass the $50 billion mark and which will swallow 43 cents of every new tax dollar."It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.
-
December 31st, 2015, 01:53 PM #12
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
This is why deficit spending for compensation is so bad. Eventually, the obligations will just eat you alive.
Public tax money should not be used to make guarantees about future compensation for public employees. All compensation earned should be paid in full at the time earned. If their futures do not turn out like they hope, either through poor planning or misfortune, too bad.
-
December 31st, 2015, 01:57 PM #13
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
And yet there he sits in Harrisburg thanks to some of the biggest complainers on this very forum.
Anyways, it's not like any teacher, cop, state worker, etc. would stand by while any of their pension and health care is cut in any meaningful way. Hell, they are outraged if the rate of growth is reduced.
-
December 31st, 2015, 02:05 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
-
412/724,
Pennsylvania
(Butler County) - Posts
- 1,654
- Rep Power
- 0
-
December 31st, 2015, 02:10 PM #15
-
December 31st, 2015, 02:15 PM #16
-
December 31st, 2015, 02:39 PM #17
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
-
December 31st, 2015, 02:58 PM #18
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
Also a problem.
If we're going to have "public schools" at all, I think the model should work this way:
- Facilities are owned by private companies, responsible for their upkeep and maintenance - and taxed, just like any other property owner
- Companies building such facilities are entitled to issue tax-free bonds, to reduce costs
- These companies are responsible for staffing all non-academic, non-school administration positions (janitoral, secretarial, lunch room, etc.)
- Contracts with the companies are on a cost-plus basis, with a SALARY CAP, based on the number of students attending the school
- Contracts are for a reasonable period of time (say, 10 years)
- Districts are required to schedule FULL USE of these facilities, 12 months per year, minus modest breaks. No more capital facilities sitting virtually unused all summer. They can either go to a year-round system, or put students on a rotating schedule (so that at no time is the facility not being used).
Companies can compete for business based on the facilities they provide vs what districts will pay for, are guaranteed a reasonable return on investment (a utility model) and non-teaching costs are controlled. No more taxpayer-funded govt bonds for building these palaces or taking land off the taxrolls.Last edited by free; December 31st, 2015 at 03:01 PM.
-
December 31st, 2015, 05:04 PM #19
Re: No, Tom Wolf Can’t Govern Pennsylvania
Throwing more money at schools has been proved to be nothing more than a payback for unions. It does nothing to improve the quality of education the chilren gets.
Corruption is the default behavior of government officials. JPC
-
December 31st, 2015, 05:35 PM #20
Similar Threads
-
Wolf Military Classic? Different than Wolf?
By Skuggi in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: August 30th, 2007, 09:46 PM
Bookmarks