18 year old OC transportation

[Emptymag]

Hot air balloon?

[streaker69]

Hot air balloon?

Yes, including Zeppelins, even Led ones.

Could he fly the gun on a drone above his head while he rides a bike?

[abner13]

You can't get a DUI on a horse... but I bet it would be argued that it's a "conveyance".

I've read of instances where exactly that has happened. People have been cited. Never heard of any trial outcome.


http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.VezjvJXosyU

[Carson]

If I recall, it's worded as a conveyance, which a skateboard, bike, go-kart, riding mower or tactical wheelbarrow could be considered one. If you can ride upon it, it's a no-no for transporting sans an LTCF.

Tactical wheelbarrow. And the militarization continues.

[knight0334]

The problem you would get into is that a bike.. skateboard... go-kart..riding mower.. tactical wheelbarrow.. are all considered "vehicles" for purposes of DUI. An ADA worth half his salt will argue that a "vehicle" is a "conveyance". You can't get a DUI on a horse... but I bet it would be argued that it's a "conveyance".

I've read of instances where exactly that has happened. People have been cited. Never heard of any trial outcome.


http://content.usatoday.com/communit...1#.VezjvJXosyU

Commonwealth v. Noel (2004) http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-suprem...t/1064130.html

Old DUI law was found to be unconstitutional and the guy got off. He is the reason why there is the present DUI law, which would apply to horses.

Dissenting opinion snippit:



A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
And no one can talk to a horse of course
That is, of course, unless the horse is the famous Mr. Ed.

Go right to the source and ask the horse
He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse.
He's always on a steady course. Talk to Mr. Ed.

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
but the Vehicle Code does not divorce
its application from, perforce,
a steed, as my colleagues said.

"It's not vague" I'll say until I'm hoarse,
and whether a car, a truck or horse
this law applies with equal force,
and I'd reverse instead.
Because I cannot agree this statute is vague or ambiguous, I respectfully dissent.
—Noel v. Travis, 857 A.2d 1283, 1289 (Pa. 2004)