Results 11 to 20 of 52
-
July 29th, 2015, 08:38 AM #11
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
I remember a while back some dumbass politician found an advertisement for a 300-round Airsoft magazine that looked like a standard AR magazine and they went absolutely batshit crazy over it.
I wonder if this guy found an advertisement for a 1,000-round Airsoft drum...
-
July 29th, 2015, 08:42 AM #12
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
Lets see the citizens pull a New York. In 365 days I bet the anti-rights coty council will have 1%, maybe 2%, of those dreaded 'high capacity assault magazines'. Shannon Watts, Little Napoleon & their minions will claim victory, and the rest of us will all know the inside joke.
Last edited by Jhaydeno; July 29th, 2015 at 08:45 AM.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.
-
July 29th, 2015, 08:49 AM #13
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
One of the places where a standard capacity mag. is actually NEEDED and they take away the citizen's right to own it. Oh wait, retired LAPD are going to be allowed to retain their SC mags., sounds about par for the course.
If I ever step foot in that hell-hole, I deserve to be shot!
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:04 AM #14
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
I'm curious what they're going to do about certain magazines that hold multiple calibers.
Like, say, a Glock 27 magazine that is stamped for 40 S&W and will hold 9 rounds of 40 S&W. Perfectly legal in L.A. But it'll also hold 11 rounds of 9x19mm and work in a Glock 26.
Or an AR-platform magazine stamped for 50 Beowulf and rated to hold 10 rounds of 50 Beowulf. Perfectly legal in L.A. But it'll also hold 30 rounds of 223 Remington or 300 Blackout.
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:04 AM #15
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
"Nobody knows more about firearm safety than I do," he added, underscoring the notion that with the proper training, people could possess such magazines safely.Proud to be a Longwall pig...
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:08 AM #16
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
Those poor people.
Gunowner99 - NRA Benefactor Life Member
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:13 AM #17Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
-
Southern York County,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 849
- Rep Power
- 15373428
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
More MINDLESS feel good stuff. I am doing something to save the children in LA.
We are banning a mean and nasty "thing" This will achieve nothing but it makes the idiots feel oh so good!!In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:20 AM #18
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
"consider an amendment to the gun magazine ordinance that would exempt retired police officers."
What affords them more right to self defense than the peasants?
JustinLife has a melody. Not great, not terrible.
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:21 AM #19
-
July 29th, 2015, 09:30 AM #20
Re: Los Angeles bans POSSESSION of standard-capacity magazines!
My Feedback - http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.ph...ight=stainless
Similar Threads
-
high-capacity / standard capacity magazines
By the deer hunter in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: May 2nd, 2014, 12:28 PM -
Why We Must Ban High-Capacity Gun Magazines
By andrewjs18 in forum GeneralReplies: 50Last Post: April 12th, 2011, 08:19 PM -
New Surefire High-Capacity Magazines
By bac0nfat in forum RiflesReplies: 8Last Post: February 7th, 2011, 10:39 AM -
Will Glock hi capacity magazines be banned?
By Last Resort in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: January 15th, 2011, 06:06 PM
Bookmarks