Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
July 22nd, 2015, 06:05 AM #1
Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
I smell an Ocourt martial. This would dot the I's and cross the T's of Obama's gun control fraud
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/22...anooga-gunman/
Navy officer and one of the Marines murdered in last week's attack on a military center in Chattanooga fired their personal weapons at the gunman, according to a report published Wednesday.
The Navy Times, citing multiple military officials familiar with internal reports on the tragedy, reported that Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, the commanding officer at the Navy Operational Support Center, fired his sidearm at Mohammed Abdulazeez during Thursday's attack.
The paper, citing a Navy official, also reported that one of the four Marines killed in the attack fired his 9mm Glock at the gunman. A Navy sailor also died in the shootout, as did the gunman. The possibility that the Marine had used his personal sidearm during the shooting was first reported by The Washington Post Monday.
A source close to the investigation told the Navy Times that while the details of the attack's final moments are unclear, authorities have uncovered no information that contradicts the Navy's own reporting.
Law enforcement sources told Fox News Tuesday that the FBI recovered the Glock at the scene and noted it did not belong to either the shooter or police. The sources said the weapon had been fired. Details about what type of weapon White used are unclear.
It is still unclear whether the shots that killed Abdulazeez were fired by White, the Marine, or local police. Fox News has learned that autopsies of the gunman and his victims have been completed and could be released later this week. The Navy Times reported that investigators won't know who fired the shots that stopped the rampage until a ballistics assessment is performed.
It is against Defense Department policy for anyone but military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property. It was not immediately clear whether White would face disciplinary action.
The shooting at so-called “gun-free” military installations in Tennessee has prompted calls for a policy change.
Governors in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Indiana and Florida have ordered National Guardsmen to be armed, and Florida Gov. Rick Scott relocated recruiters to armories.
U.S. military officials have said security at recruiting and reserve centers will be reviewed, but the Army's top officer, Gen. Ray Odierno, said it's too early to say whether the facilities should have security guards or other increased protection. He said there are concerns about accidental discharges and other security issues related to carrying loaded weapons.
However, Gen. Mark Milley, the man tapped as Odierno's replacement as Army chief of staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday that if legal issues could be resolved he thinks it would be appropriate, in some cases, to arm soldiers manning recruiting stations.
Tucked in strip malls in rural and suburban communities and in high-traffic city spots like New York's Times Square, military recruiting and reserve stations are designed to be open and welcoming to the public. The troops inside aren't allowed to carry weapons.
The ban is largely due to legal issues, such as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the federal government from using the military for domestic law enforcement. U.S. forces don't routinely carry guns when they are not in combat or on military bases. And Pentagon officials are sensitive to any appearance of armed troops within the United States.
Meanwhile, The New York Times reported Wednesday that the gunman, 24-year-old Abdulazeez, searched the Internet in the days leading up to the attack for information from Islamic sources about whether martyrdom would to forgiveness for his sins, such as drunkenness. The Hixson, Tenn. native was due in court after being arrested in April on a charge of driving under the influenceLast edited by PocketProtector; July 22nd, 2015 at 06:17 AM.
Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain
-
July 22nd, 2015, 08:38 AM #2
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
I rather stand a trial than to be dropped in the ground. For all that why wasnt this "Federal Property" protected?
SEMPER GUMBY
-
July 22nd, 2015, 09:11 AM #3
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
I sure hope they find that the personally owned firearms are what ended that attack...
-
July 22nd, 2015, 09:41 AM #4
-
July 22nd, 2015, 09:44 AM #5
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
Bluetrane2028
I sure hope they find that the personally owned firearms are what ended that attack..."
I can imagine the Ospin on thatLast edited by PocketProtector; July 22nd, 2015 at 09:51 AM.
Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain
-
July 22nd, 2015, 09:51 AM #6
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
Login
NEWS
Sources: Navy officer, Marine fought to take out Chattanooga gunman
By David Larter, Staff writer
10 hours ago
Facebook
Twitter
Google Plus
more
WTVF via AP)
Law enforcement work the scene of a shooting July 16 at the Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga, Tennessee. less
Navy
Sources tell Navy Times that Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, commanding officer of the Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga, Tenn., fired on Muhammad Abdulazeez hoping to kill or wound the gunman who murdered five service members last week. less
A Navy officer and a Marine fired their sidearms hoping to kill or subdue the gunman who murdered five service members last week in Chattanooga, Tennessee, according to multiple military officials familiar with internal reporting on the tragedy.
It remains unclear whether either hit Muhammad Abdulazeez, who was shot and killed on July 16 after he gunned down four Marines and a sailor at the Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga. It's also unclear why they were armed, as it is against Defense Department policy for anyone other than military police or law enforcement to carry weapons on federal property.
A report distributed among senior Navy leaders during the shooting's aftermath said Lt. Cmdr. Timothy White, the support center's commanding officer, used his personal firearm to engage Abdulazeez, Navy Times confirmed with four separate sources. A Navy official also confirmed a Washington Post report indicating one of the slain Marines may have been carrying a 9mm Glock and possibly returned fire on the gunman.
Hamilton County Sheriffs Office via AP
Mohammad Youssduf Adbulazeez less
The various law enforcement agencies investigating the Chattanooga shooting declined to comment. A source close to the investigation said details of the rampage's last few minutes remain unclear, but no information has emerged to contradict the Navy's internal findings.
Authorities will not know whether White or the Marine hit Abdulazeez until an autopsy and ballistics assessment are performed.
Several attempts to contact White were unsuccessful.
The shootings in Chattanooga unfolded on the morning of July 16 when, the FBI said, Abdulazeez pumped dozens of rounds into a strip mall recruiting station before driving across town to the Navy support center. No one was killed inside the recruiting station.
Police responding to the first shooting passed the Navy support center en route, and some were diverted to the scene of the second attack, according to a source with knowledge of the investigation.
Killed in the attack were Marine Gunnery Sgt. Thomas Sullivan, Lance Cpl. Squire K. Wells, Staff Sgt. David Wyatt and Sgt. Carson Holmquist. Navy Logistics Specialist 2nd Class Randall Smith died on July 18 from wounds sustained during the shooting.
http://www.navytimes.com/story/milit...nman/30426817/"Cives Arma Ferant"
"I know I'm not James Bond, that's why I don't keep a loaded gun under the pillow, or bang Russian spies on a regular basis." - GunLawyer001
-
July 22nd, 2015, 09:53 AM #7
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
The ban is largely due to legal issues, such as the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the federal government from using the military for domestic law enforcement. U.S. forces don't routinely carry guns when they are not in combat or on military bases. And Pentagon officials are sensitive to any appearance of armed troops within the United States.
-
July 24th, 2015, 11:39 AM #8
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
They should change the policy so the recruiters can CC, or have the CO have a small armory in his office in case this happens again.
Because Failure Is Not An Option
-
July 25th, 2015, 04:27 PM #9
Re: Navy officer, Marine reportedly returned fire at Chattanooga gunman
I still don’t understand how he was so deadly. The shooters at that cartoon drawing context couldn’t get out of their car before getting shot dead.
Similar Threads
-
Police Officer Shot at Chattanooga, Tennessee U.S. Naval Reserve Center
By djpup in forum NationalReplies: 2Last Post: July 16th, 2015, 06:06 PM -
Connecticut Officer Reportedly Placed on Leave Over This Facebook Comment to Gun Owne
By qmcorps in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: March 12th, 2014, 11:32 AM -
Gunman opens fire on NYFD
By IIIIIREPOIIIII in forum NationalReplies: 32Last Post: December 26th, 2012, 12:11 AM
Bookmarks