Newtown school panel to include proposed gun ban in report

**TSimonetti** · January 18th, 2015, 05:51 PM

I'm wondering why they chose more than 10 rounds as the cutoff? Is it because they find the loss of 10 or less children without having to re-load acceptable in any new mass shooting?

Or is it because banning more than 10 rounds has proven to be politically expedient, and will create a stepping stone for future recommendations regarding further restrictions and bans?

Did anyone in the media have the balls to ask them this simple yet revealing question?

**SwampFoxZ71** · January 18th, 2015, 07:02 PM

Originally Posted by TSimonetti

I'm wondering why they chose more than 10 rounds as the cutoff? Is it because they find the loss of 10 or less children without having to re-load acceptable in any new mass shooting?

Or is it because banning more than 10 rounds has proven to be politically expedient, and will create a stepping stone for future recommendations regarding further restrictions and bans?

Did anyone in the media have the balls to ask them this simple yet revealing question?

Because ten simply sounds like it's being reasonable, no more, no less. I'm sure it was 'tested' in polling at some point.

**LifeInPa** · January 18th, 2015, 07:06 PM

They better keep that shit in their home state, the nation has spoken and most reject gun control.

**TSimonetti** · January 18th, 2015, 08:26 PM

Originally Posted by SwampFoxZ71

Because ten simply sounds like it's being reasonable, no more, no less. I'm sure it was 'tested' in polling at some point.

Its certainly not reasonable from a gun rights perspective, or from a leftist perspective. (After all, it doesn't take 10 rounds to kill a Dee-ya (that's Deer in New York/New England speak) So it's rather obvious that further bans are on the wish list, but are not currently politically viable.

So we are left with a bogus report that is supposed to find answers to the problem(which in reality have nothing to do with mag cap) but instead sends the ridiculous message that children's lives during a mass shooting are not worth protecting with armed teachers or security, and that their lives only really matter after the 10th round.(assuming the deranged psycho decides to obey the law on mag restrictions)

**gummy jones** · January 18th, 2015, 08:28 PM

About time something was done to stop the carnage that is the ruger 10/22

**win67** · January 19th, 2015, 12:42 AM

Originally Posted by gummy jones

About time something was done to stop the carnage that is the ruger 10/22

Seriously, and that's not even to mention those menacing leverguns criminals always use to kill children for no reason.

**GeneCC** · January 19th, 2015, 01:05 AM

Originally Posted by TSimonetti

I'm wondering why they chose more than 10 rounds as the cutoff?

They would probably like to send Goon Squads to every home "House to House" to seize it all. They know that if one in a thousand "resists" that they're gonna run out of goons real fast. They might run out of politicians if they get voted out too.

They pick a "nice reasonable compromise" figure.