Results 1 to 10 of 26
Thread: ATF ruling......
-
January 3rd, 2015, 04:25 PM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
-
ELIZABETH,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 27
- Rep Power
- 0
ATF ruling......
I guess this puts a damper on things for some people:
http://www.atf.gov/sites/default/fil...unsmithing.pdf
-
January 3rd, 2015, 04:36 PM #2
Grand Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
-
Chalfont,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 2,234
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: ATF ruling......
Saw that one coming.
I turned down several requests to set up 80% receivers in anticipation of the atfe noticing the market trend.Crusader's local #556 South Central Asia chapter
-
January 3rd, 2015, 04:46 PM #3
Active Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
-
York Springs,
Pennsylvania
(Adams County) - Posts
- 131
- Rep Power
- 505706
Re: ATF ruling......
The summation here seems to be only that shops can't allow unlicensed individuals to bring in "80%" receiver blanks and use the shop's machinery to complete them.
Ok. Is there more that I missed?--Sam
-
January 3rd, 2015, 09:04 PM #4
-
January 3rd, 2015, 09:31 PM #5
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
-
Poconos,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 28
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: ATF ruling......
And it is their first ruling of the year. I bet there are folks there that have been excited to release this.
Glad I have a drill press, cross slide vice and some end mills.
-
January 3rd, 2015, 10:53 PM #6
Active Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
- Location
-
York Springs,
Pennsylvania
(Adams County) - Posts
- 131
- Rep Power
- 505706
Re: ATF ruling......
Right. It doesn't seem to come any closer to trying to say a non-licensee cannot build, or complete, his own firearm or firearm receiver.
It was already pretty clear that parts sellers or gun dealers couldn't construct guns for people without being manufacturers, and that gunsmiths couldn't take chunks (what we'd call "80% receiver blanks") and finish them out into functional receivers for people without that license (and marking the gun as required for any manufacturer-made firearm).
This just further clarifies that bringing people into your shop and letting them push the buttons on your CNC machine isn't a legitimate way to get around those restrictions.
(Accepting that the entire GCA licensing scheme should be thrown out and stomped on as garbage) This isn't a very big deal.--Sam
-
January 4th, 2015, 02:09 AM #7
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
- Location
-
ELIZABETH,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 27
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: ATF ruling......
How would this effect a "build party"?
-
January 4th, 2015, 06:40 AM #8
-
January 4th, 2015, 08:17 AM #9
Re: ATF ruling......
I wonder how this would affect 3D printing manufacturing? That is essentially the same as a CNC machine.
The ruling seems to focus on whether there is a business involved. If I own a machine shop that is an operating business, I can't allow you to use my machines to manufacture a "firearm". If I have a Bridgeport in my garage that I use for my own hobby, I could. Maybe...
-
January 4th, 2015, 08:55 AM #10
Similar Threads
-
That Chicago Gun Ban Ruling
By buster2209 in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: July 2nd, 2010, 06:52 PM -
DER SPIEGEL on SC ruling
By larrymeyer in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: June 27th, 2008, 11:22 PM
Bookmarks