Ron Paul's Message to Obama!

[lexington86]

Ron Paul discusses what he thinks about all of Obama's rhetoric.

[Tootie]

And that's just one more reason why I will be writing in Ron Paul this November.

[theSaj]

I think I'll be doing the same...that or you have to vote for the Trinity of Sleaze "McCain the Father, Obama the Son, Hillary the Unholy Spirit - Three Persons, One Politician!"

[ThomasJ]

Bob Barr is also a good choice.

[markheck1]

unfortunately, a vote for anyone else is a vote for Obama by Proxy

[theSaj]

I'm not convinced a vote for Obama is a bad thing.

The Clintons were horrible, not as bad as Obama would likely be, but that enabled Newt Gingrich and the contract with America. The balanced budget policies and line-item veto (all destroyed by the over-powered judicial branch).

But perhaps someone even worse will give us the motivation to have the revolution this country needs. Preferably a peaceful one...cause if we don't - a bloody one is sure to come.

***
EDIT: for clarification, if we had a good candidate...than I'd be all for them. But when you have lousy, bad, and horrible. Then there's not much difference. Except if you elect horrible, than people might reject that party the next time.

[ThomasJ]

unfortunately, a vote for anyone else is a vote for Obama by Proxy

I strongly disagree with that.

[theshadow]

unfortunately, a vote for anyone else is a vote for Obama by Proxy

Sorry I strongly disagree.Like many I've fallen for the 'lesser of two evils' line before and look what it's gotten us, the Democratic party Dream A Socialist who want wealth redistribution, and removal of certain civil rights vs a Liberal who want removal of certain civil rights and sell out of the nation to foreign undocumented invaders. Either way the man who wants to be King wants to take or curtail civil rights, and undermine the foundation of the Nation in which I served and love.

[tourrider]

I'm not convinced a vote for Obama is a bad thing.

The Clintons were horrible, not as bad as Obama would likely be, but that enabled Newt Gingrich and the contract with America. The balanced budget policies and line-item veto (all destroyed by the over-powered judicial branch).

But perhaps someone even worse will give us the motivation to have the revolution this country needs. Preferably a peaceful one...cause if we don't - a bloody one is sure to come.

***
EDIT: for clarification, if we had a good candidate...than I'd be all for them. But when you have lousy, bad, and horrible. Then there's not much difference. Except if you elect horrible, than people might reject that party the next time.

I'd take Clinton over Obama. She is smarter, and she dislikes America a little less then Obama's absolute loathing of America, it's freedom, and free speach of the people.

No, I am not a closet Clinton supporter. When I pull the lever, I have one thing on my mind, the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and the Sovereignty of the United States.

[ChamberedRound]

Loved Paul's comments on Obama, finally someone who's not afraid to call him out for what he is: a sham.

And that's just one more reason why I will be writing in Ron Paul this November.

I thought you might find this interesting:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog/?p=34

Write in Ron Paul? The Doctor Says No

Via Lew Rockwell’s Blog:

Here is what Ron says: “I don’t think that’s very productive. Supporters can do it, of course, but in most of the states it won’t count. And if they can change the rules in a primary and not count all the votes, imagine what they could do with write-in votes!”