Is the Beretta Nano OK?

**theyoungone** · May 23rd, 2013, 10:42 PM

Well I'm back in the market for a new 9mm pocket gun. I had a Ruger LC9 but recently sold it. I just really disliked that gun.

I was looking at tnhe Beretta Nano, but I remember early on they had reliability issues with 115 grain 9mm ammo, which is basically most of the ammo I have in my stash.

These days with ammo being a little tough to find and not cheap, I don't want to screw around with a ammo sensitive pistol. Anyone have a new version and have they fix the reliability issue.

**HRearden** · May 23rd, 2013, 11:07 PM

I don't have a nano but I have both the LC9 and the LC380 and I was just curious about what you disliked so much about the LC9?

**shooker8** · May 23rd, 2013, 11:57 PM

Never saw a nano be problematic. My buddy I shoot with has 1k through his and I'm at about 3k through my LC9. I personally like the trigger way better on the LC9 compared to the nano (I'm a revolver guy guy). The nano has a heavier, but shorter pull and LC9 smoother, longer, and lighter pull.

**guard dog** · May 24th, 2013, 04:05 PM

Check the Beretta Forum for NANO problems. Unless you can find P+ 9mm
ammo for it you might want to try the Kahr CM9. I made the switch and never looked back. If you could settle for .380 you should check out the NEW
Beretta Pico. Beretta designed it with all the NANO problems in mind.