Results 1 to 10 of 19
-
March 31st, 2013, 06:11 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
-
Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 264
- Rep Power
- 858087
Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
Check this out.. Two men broke into this mans home to burglerize his 1st floor jewelry store..
First Article
Second Article
-
March 31st, 2013, 06:21 PM #2
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
those articles are full of liberal bias and undertones that maybe the victim did something wrong. note here that the victim isnt the dead guy or the other one who got away.
Montani Semper Liberi
-
March 31st, 2013, 06:45 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
-
Leifsbudhir
- Posts
- 436
- Rep Power
- 115530
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
To be fair I think both articles were pretty (even uncharacteristically) neutral in the matter, simply mentioning the home owner will not be charged. I don't think this is the same as implying the victim did anything wrong, but I do think if there was any doubt it would be investigated and the man charged.
As it stands its a good thing they mentioned this, it will teach people who think you will be charged for defending yourself that it isn't the case. YMMV.
-
March 31st, 2013, 06:57 PM #4
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
"Police continue to search for the second suspect. Officials say Heng will not be charged because he has a right to carry a gun inside his home even though he doesn't have a permit.
In Pennsylvania, a person can be found justified to use force against someone who has broken into their home under the so-called “Castle Doctrine” that was amended in 2011."
Quotes from the first article. Kind of a liberal spin there.
The second srticle seems a bit more neutral. To be honest they both seemed a less tainted than what I have been reading the last several months.Some people just plain suck.
If you're gonna be dumb ya gotta be tough.
-
March 31st, 2013, 06:58 PM #5
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
"Officials say Heng will not be charged because he has a right to carry a gun inside his home even though he doesn't have a permit."
i guess i would just find it more productive if the media actually educated the public rather than plant this subliminal message that you need a permit to own a gun in PA.Montani Semper Liberi
-
April 1st, 2013, 08:13 AM #6
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
Post in the article comment section, spreading the truth is important!. Spread the law!
"Cives Arma Ferant"
"I know I'm not James Bond, that's why I don't keep a loaded gun under the pillow, or bang Russian spies on a regular basis." - GunLawyer001
-
April 2nd, 2013, 12:16 AM #7
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
Come on guys, I'm surprised no one caught this little gem from the NBC article:
In Pennsylvania, a person can be found justified to use force against someone who has broken into their home under the so-called “Castle Doctrine” that was amended in 2011.
-
April 3rd, 2013, 04:00 PM #8
-
April 4th, 2013, 12:54 AM #9
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
Then the home owner is also innocent, So why release his name? It pisses because this thug's relatives will probably be on the local liberal news station saying with tears in there eyes "My little Bill was a nice young man. He just needed some money". Then they portray the homeowner who was protecting his home, family, and business as a someone who walked up and shot this burglar in cold blood.
Also no matter what the outcome of this case is, Who wants to bet this home owner will never be able to get a LTCF threw Phila with out a lawyer.
-
April 20th, 2013, 04:30 AM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Age
- 43
- Posts
- 5
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Philadelphia homeowner defends his family and kills a burgler
Ive heard that if someone is breaking into your home, and you shoot him in self defense. That it is best to shoot to kill, because if you injure him, he can sue you. And also, you can only fire a weapon if the burglar is armed. Is this true??
Similar Threads
-
Chicago gun ban ignored as senior citizen defends himself and kills felon intruder
By buster2209 in forum NationalReplies: 11Last Post: June 28th, 2010, 09:42 PM -
TX man kills burgler after parrot's "hello, hello"
By thirtyonebravo in forum GeneralReplies: 4Last Post: October 18th, 2007, 04:32 PM
Bookmarks