Results 11 to 20 of 218
Thread: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
-
December 19th, 2006, 11:29 AM #11Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
-
Upper Pottsgrove,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Age
- 51
- Posts
- 3,650
- Rep Power
- 0
-
December 19th, 2006, 11:30 AM #12Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37698
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
that is backwards from the true american way.
the spirit of this country (outlined in the declaration of independence...liberty and the right to the pursuit of happiness) is that everything is legal unless there is a compelling reason to make it illegal...or at least that is supposed to be the spirit of this country.
you don't have to ask "why should something be legal?"...you have to ask "why should something be illegal?" if there is not a good answer to that question, then it should not be illegal.
but, to answer your question, because AR15s are lightweight, accurate weapons which would make fine hunting rifles.Last edited by LittleRedToyota; December 19th, 2006 at 11:32 AM.
-
December 19th, 2006, 11:51 AM #13
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
A big +1 on that one LRT. The bottom line here is that the state "powers that be" should be explaining to us why it is illegal to hunt with a semi. Everyone on this board knows that there is no real difference in the weapons other than the fact that the semi will load the next round. I've seen people come awfully close to semi speed with a good lever gun.
Bill USAF 1976 - 1986, NRA Endowment, USCCA
-
December 19th, 2006, 08:56 PM #14
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
Well, if its backwards, then why not full-auto for hunting?
There are plenty of rifles, other than semi-auto AR's that fit your description.
I have plenty of semi-auto rifles, but I don't see the need to be hunting with them.
So again, I'll play the devils advocate here, other than the "because I want to use them", why should they be allowed?
-
December 19th, 2006, 09:29 PM #15
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
I could see one reason not to allow semis to hunt...remember the guy in WI that shot all of those hunters with his SKS. If he had a bolt action...he wouldn't have been able to get the drop on so many hunters.
PA is funny when it comes to hunting laws...that's all I will say on the matter.
While I would like to be able to hunt predators and vermin with an AR15, I will follow PA law. I do know of a gentleman that works for the Game Commission that does "island hunts" and you are able to use any weapon. I am tempted to take out my DPMS and take a boar with it.
As a hunter, if I miss a shot...I don't deserve a second chance. Shot placement is the most important aspect while hunting. Even though I own a few semi's I always use them as though they were bolt actions...one shot...one hit.
-
December 20th, 2006, 12:10 AM #16Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37698
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
good question...if one cannot provide a compelling reason to not allow full autos for hunting, then they should be allowed.
i'm not saying one could not offer a compelling reason...perhaps safety of other hunters would be such a reason.
So again, I'll play the devils advocate here, other than the "because I want to use them", why should they be allowed?
aubie has offered reasons why semi-autos should not be allowed for hunting...i even offered one earlier...i don't find them compelling, but that is just my opinion. if you do find them compelling, then, in your opinion (which is apparently shared by the game commission), there is justification for curtailing my right to the pursuit of happiness in this case.
however, to say it should be illegal simply because i can't or won't give a reason why it should be legal doesn't work...or at least it should not work....in america. if that were how things worked, then everything would be illegal by default and we would have laws saying what is legal rather than the other way around.
to attempt to answer your question in the manner your are looking for, though, i can't really give you a reason other than "because i want to"...and maybe "so i don't have to buy multiple rifles to fulfill the roles of home defense, being prepared to defend the state and country against invasion (the original intent of the 2nd amendment, after all), and hunting".
but just saying "because i want to" is a good enough reason unless those who don't want to allow me to can come up with a compelling reason to not allow me to (of course, there are differences of opinion on what constitutes a compelling reason).Last edited by LittleRedToyota; December 20th, 2006 at 12:43 AM.
-
December 20th, 2006, 12:54 AM #17
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
Then why not have a free-for-all, any type of firearm, any type of ammo, etc.
The PGC regulates what types of firearms can and cannot be used. They also restrict certain types of ammo for some seasons and game animals.
So if you argue, "its America"......then logic follows that you think the free-for-all is the way to go.
Hunting and the right to carry arms are two totally different things. While you may own whatever firearms you want, if you want to play the hunting game, then you have to play by the hunting rules.
-
December 20th, 2006, 01:23 AM #18Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37698
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
no, i think the free-for-all should be limited where there is a compelling (and constitutionally acceptable...though that doesn't really come into play here) reason to do so.
if you want to play the hunting game, then you have to play by the hunting rules.
by default, you start off with no rules...that's just the way it is. before the PA game comission (or whoever made the first rules) made the first rules, there were no rules. thus, by default--before any rules were made, you could use any weapon to hunt.
starting from this condition of no rules, you could just make random rules, but that doesn't seem to make sense. it seems to make more sense to only make rules that have some reasoning behind them. if you agree with this, then the rule "you are not allowed to use a semi-auto to hunt" should only be a rule if there is a reason behind it.
in my opinion, there is not a compelling reason for that rule.
in my opinion, there is a compelling reason for the rule "you cannot use a full-auto weapon to hunt" and for many other rules regarding hunting like safety zones, bag limits, seasons, having to wear orange, minimum calibers, etc.
-
December 20th, 2006, 05:37 PM #19
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
Auto-Loading shotguns are permitted so why not auto-loading rifles. If the round capacity is an issue why not a magazine restriction say 5 or 10 rounds? I have a similar beef with the game commission, I hunt in the special regs areas and we can use a muzzleloader with a 200 yd. effective range but we can not hunt deer with handguns like a revolver or break open, Why?
-
December 20th, 2006, 10:01 PM #20Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
-
N/A
- Posts
- 312
- Rep Power
- 498419
Re: Why no semi-autos for hunting?
Similar Threads
-
.357 Magnum semi-auto?
By ChamberedRound in forum GeneralReplies: 17Last Post: March 15th, 2011, 01:24 PM -
Buying Semi-Auto Rifles from Gun Shows
By DrakinClaw in forum GeneralReplies: 14Last Post: December 4th, 2008, 02:27 AM -
Semi .22LRs
By Willtallica in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: December 7th, 2006, 10:00 AM -
WTB police marked semi-autos
By JohnUSCG in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: November 4th, 2006, 08:14 PM -
Hunting story
By Frenchy in forum HuntingReplies: 0Last Post: September 10th, 2006, 01:20 PM
Bookmarks