Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsyltucky, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,076
    Rep Power
    21474862

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by bac0nfat View Post
    It's really simple, I don't know why people struggle with it.





    Those two things pretty much completely sum up the relationship between the federal and state governments.

    In a nutshell, states cannot pass laws regarding anything that's already in the Constitution, and the federal government cannot pass laws regarding anything that's NOT in the Constitution.

    Examples:

    The right to bear arms is in the Constitution, so states can't mess with it.

    Health care is not in the Constitution, so the federal government can't mess with it.

    Of course, both those things have been "messed" with beyond recognition anyway.
    Then again there is this little gem from Article 1 Section 8

    The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


    ...To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
    which the SCOTUS in 1940 saw fit to abuse and has forever voided your common sense interpretation of the Constitution by giving the federal government supreme power to fuck the states and its pathetic inhabitants forever more via the commerce clause.
    FUCK BIDEN

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New Britain Township, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,890
    Rep Power
    372629

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by God's Country View Post
    ...
    Yeah forgot to mention interstate commerce. If it has ever, could ever, or might ever cross state lines they think they have a free pass to regulate the shit out of it.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brookville, Pennsylvania
    (Jefferson County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    20,111
    Rep Power
    21474874

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    States don't have rights, they have powers.

    All rights and powers originate in the People. The People then gave certain powers to the Federal and state governments in the Constitution. We then reserved some rights that were enumerated in the Bill of Rights(and some amendments after that). We(the People) also stated that even though we didn't enumerate an act, it is in deed a right(see 9th Amendment - any act is a right until regulated). We then set a limit of powers to the federal government, then reserved all other powers that weren't specifically dedicated to the federal and/or state governments to the states and the people(allowing the states to regulate the rights and powers that weren't specifically enumerated).

    Long ago some jackwagons in the Supreme Court stated that the Constitution and Amendments didn't directly apply to the states, which in some cases they were correct. However it has been miss-interpreted to apply to against the entire Constitution and all amendments. In that ruling long ago it was found that in the 1st Amendment it only limited "Congress", which was correct. The 2nd Amendment doesn't have that word in it, it completely reserves the Right to Keep and Bear Arms to the people. That in all logic also forbids the states from infringing upon the 2nd Amendment too.

    A State of the Constitutional United States of American derives it's statehood from the power of the people. It is the Constitution that provides the means to become a state. To become a state the Constitution must be ratified by the potential state, they must recognize the reservation of powers and rights. Any amendment that comes after ratification is treated as original text to the Constitution - so there again, the states must recognize the reservation of any powers or rights.

    Also protected in the original text of the Constitution is your right to the same protections of law, privileges, and immunities as residents of other states when you travel to those states(see Article IV Section 2). If we even cede for sake of argument that a state can limit carrying of guns by means of licensing - so long as that state issues licenses to it's own residents, it must issue to non-residents too or at minimum honor the license of the other state. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms was ruled an individual and fundamental right protected by the US Constitution, and even following prior Supreme Court cases that only fundamental rights are protected by Art IV, Sec. 2 - the states are bound to some means of allowing you to possess a gun even as a non-resident. The Federal government has all authority to protect individual's rights from state abuse, whether by law or even the use of military action against the state(s).

    Now, the proper way the Supreme Court should have ruled was that the 2nd Amendment was self incorporating since the right was specifically reserved to the people - not to the states and the people.
    RIP: SFN, 1861, twoeggsup, Lambo, jamesjo, JayBell, 32 Magnum, Pro2A, mrwildroot, dregan, Frenchy, Fragger, ungawa, Mtn Jack, Grapeshot, R.W.J., PennsyPlinker, Statkowski, Deanimator, roland, aubie515

    Don't end up in my signature!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Newark, Delaware
    Posts
    578
    Rep Power
    42618

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    The citizen created the state, and the states created the fed utilizing authority granted by the citizen.

    The right to defense is a natural right, it should be no domain of the government beyond ensuring the right exists unhampered.

    Any citizen is greater than any government.

    /for those among us who haven't seen it yet.




    "X is what percentage of Y?" Divide the first number by the second, multiply the answer by 100. Add a percent sign. Think.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southampton, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    577
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    knight0334:
    Long ago some jackwagons in the Supreme Court stated that the Constitution and Amendments didn't directly apply to the states, which in some cases they were correct. That was kinda said in a earlier post,I thought I was pretty well versed in the ground breaking stuff the court did.. Guess Not.
    Do you happen to know the case, for above. I'd like to know what made them make that decision.

    ForwardAssist:
    I'm looking forward to watching this when i get home.

    good stuff thanks for putting it up here.
    If You Need A Color In The Name Of Your Cause, You're The "RACIST" !

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Brookville, Pennsylvania
    (Jefferson County)
    Age
    51
    Posts
    20,111
    Rep Power
    21474874

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by 51158 View Post
    knight0334:
    Long ago some jackwagons in the Supreme Court stated that the Constitution and Amendments didn't directly apply to the states, which in some cases they were correct. That was kinda said in a earlier post,I thought I was pretty well versed in the ground breaking stuff the court did.. Guess Not.
    Do you happen to know the case, for above. I'd like to know what made them make that decision.


    ForwardAssist:
    I'm looking forward to watching this when i get home.

    good stuff thanks for putting it up here.
    I'm trying to remember which case it was.. ..I had drawn a blank earlier when I typed out my post. I'm thinking it was in the 1820's or 1830's, still trying to figure out which case it was.


    EDIT: Here it is- Barron v. Baltimore http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore
    Last edited by knight0334; January 6th, 2012 at 05:53 PM.
    RIP: SFN, 1861, twoeggsup, Lambo, jamesjo, JayBell, 32 Magnum, Pro2A, mrwildroot, dregan, Frenchy, Fragger, ungawa, Mtn Jack, Grapeshot, R.W.J., PennsyPlinker, Statkowski, Deanimator, roland, aubie515

    Don't end up in my signature!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    1,689
    Rep Power
    1187699

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by biggs88 View Post
    So WHY FOR THE SAKE OF EVERYTHING THAT WAS, IS, AND EVER WILL BE CAN THE STATES REGULATE MY RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.
    Because in affirming that the RKBA is an individual right (Heller) and that the 2nd Amendment constrains the states as well as the Federal government (McDonald), the Supreme Court ruled that the RKBA is subject to "reasonable" regulation.

    I don't happen to agree with that, but I'm not the final interpreter of U.S. law -- the Supreme Court is.

    The Supreme Court did NOT say that all existing (or proposed, or to-be-proposed) gun regulations are "reasonable," but the parameters of what's reasonable and what's not will take years to sort out through the courts.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Southampton, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    577
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    knight0334:

    Thanks for getting that link, I read it ,didn't make a bit of sense, so i'm putting it off til tomorrow morning. then i'll be able to think about it over a cup of coffee.

    but thanks for the follow up and there's a rep heading your way.

    THANKS AGAIN
    Last edited by 51158; January 6th, 2012 at 09:02 PM.
    If You Need A Color In The Name Of Your Cause, You're The "RACIST" !

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ...
    (York County)
    Posts
    1,892
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: State's Rights vs. Constitution

    Most people don't understand that THE PEOPLE have the ULTIMATE RIGHTS and POWER .... and although they delegated power to the Federal Government and the State Government, the actual ULTIMATE RIGHTS and POWER are still RETAINED in THE PEOPLE who can rightfully take-back that delegated power.

    Additionally, unless THE PEOPLE actually delegate additional power to the Federal or State Governments (through a change in either Constitution), they have no power to expand their own powers...

    It is the Supreme Court that is charged with protecting THE PEOPLE from both the Federal Government and the State Governments from overstepping their DELEGATED POWER by declaring UNCONSTITUTIONAL any exercise of power beyond that which was delegated .....

    It is the failure of the Supreme Court on exactly this issue that has led us down this path where the Federal and State Governments trample THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE without any repercussions....


    ...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by ImminentDanger; January 8th, 2012 at 03:30 AM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 15th, 2009, 07:10 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 26th, 2009, 02:35 PM
  3. Replies: 42
    Last Post: October 28th, 2008, 03:22 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 25th, 2008, 10:55 AM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: June 17th, 2008, 08:43 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •