Obama admin pushing hunters off public land

[bigbore94]

Here is a story I found.

Obama Pushing Shooters Off Public Lands

November 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print
Gun owners who have historically been able to use public lands for target practice would be barred from potentially millions of acres under new rules drafted by the Interior Department, the first major move by the Obama administration to impose limits on firearms.

Officials say the administration is concerned about the potential clash between gun owners and encroaching urban populations who like to use same land for hiking and dog walking.

"It's not so much a safety issue. It's a social conflict issue," said Frank Jenks, a natural resource specialist with Interior's Bureau of Land Management, which oversees 245 million acres. He adds that urbanites "freak out" when they hear shooting on public lands. [Read about the subpoena issued as a result of Operation Fast and Furious.]

If the draft policy is finally approved, some public access to Bureau lands to hunters would also be limited, potentially reducing areas deer, elk, and bear hunters can use in the West.

Conservationists and hunting groups, however, are mounting a fight. One elite group of conservationists that advises Interior and Agriculture is already pushing BLM to junk the regulations, claiming that shooters are being held to a much higher safety standard than other users of public lands, such as ATV riders.

"They are just trying to make it so difficult for recreational shooters," said Gary Kania, vice president of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation. His group is one of several, including the National Wildlife Foundation, Cabela's and Ducks Unlimited, on the Wildlife and Hunting Heritage Conservation Council fighting the new rules. During a two-day meeting ending this afternoon, they are drafting their own changes to the BLM rules.

"What we probably are going to be looking forward to is a reversal," said Kania. Asked about how to handle people who freak out when they hear shots on public lands, Kania said, "I don't know how to quanitify 'freaking out,'" and noted that he's seen people panicing when fly fishing in float tubes but nobody wants to ban then from rivers.

BLM actually invited the fight, seeking the council's comments. But officials suggested to Whispers that no changes are being planned to the draft regulations.

Over five pages, the draft BLM regulations raise concerns about how shooting can cause a "public disturbance." They also raise worries about how shooting and shooters can hurt plants and litter public lands.

This is the key paragraph foes say could lead to shooters being kicked off public lands:

"When the authorized officer determines that a site or area on BLM-managed lands used on a regular basis for recreational shooting is creating public disturbance, or is creating risk to other persons on public lands; is contributing to the defacement, removal or destruction of natural features, native plants, cultural resources, historic structures or government and/or private property; is facilitating or creating a condition of littering, refuse accumulation and abandoned personal property is violating existing use restrictions, closure and restriction orders, or supplementary rules notices, and reasonable attempts to reduce or eliminate the violations by the BLM have been unsuccessful, the authorized officer will close the affected area to recreational shooting." [Check out new* Debate Club about* whether Congress needs to overhaul gun trafficking laws.]

Squeezing out shooters, says the draft policy, is needed because, "As the West has become more populated, recreational shooters now often find themselves in conflict with other public lands users, and the BLM is frequently called on to mediate these conflicts."

At yesterday's meeting at Interior, the council balked at the BLM draft regulations, adding that the Obama administration was not being fair to shooters on the issue of safety.

In a draft retort to BLM, the council said other users of public land aren't required to be as safe as shooters. They note that shooters have a much lower injury rate than others, like ATV users. "The policy fails to recognize that recreational shooting has one of the lowest incidences of death and injury compared to virtually any other outdoor recreational activity. The policy is prejudicial and discriminatory to target shooters as compared to other recreationists," said the council's draft response, expected to be finalized today.

What's more, the group charged that the BLM is acting in a contradictory fashion, encouraging the shooting sports while limiting shooting areas.

If he gets a second term us gun owners are in trouble.

[elementfreak431]

the first major move by the Obama administration to impose limits on firearms.

The FIRST?? A bit hard to believe this is the first time Obama has tried to limit firearms use

[Brick]

See my post (#3) at:

http://forum.pafoa.org/political-was...lic-lands.html

[MDJschool]

They probably should have written that it was the first overt move to impose limits.

Was the ban of the importation of the thousands of M1s from South Korea that we produced not:
1) first?
2) overt?
3) a limit?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...ique-m-rifles/
http://www.guns.com/prospects-look-g...nds-video.html

Was anyone fired for keeping guns out of Americans' hands? Not that I've heard of.

So, I don't think the OPs story is the first.

[Yellowfin]

Hardly at all the first. Before that we have:

1. Eric Holder appointed as AG.
2. Sotomayor and Kagan appointed to the Supreme Court.
3. Hillary Clinton as Sec of State--dealing w/ UN, international trade such as that with firearms
4. Likely personal involvement in Fast & Furious.
5. The South Korean bit w/ the surplus Garands.
6. Consolidation of the ATF under the DOJ instead of Treasury.

And before president spending several years on the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation, which funds the Bradys, LCAV, VPC, and others.

[priell3]

The Obama admin has changed its mind.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...est=latestnews

[tes151]

Call your congress critter and tell them to take away the authority to do this from the Interior Department.